From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5ECC3ABD8 for ; Wed, 14 May 2025 15:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uFEGX-0000DY-I8; Wed, 14 May 2025 11:43:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uFE5g-0004GT-Ea; Wed, 14 May 2025 11:32:21 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.11]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uFE5e-00018V-HG; Wed, 14 May 2025 11:32:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747236735; x=1778772735; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=PIjFnfnYW+H9SVImmOI0C1OSncQ/MUhmxQEZA/8kCt0=; b=d/fcDRVSjjB1THJzrQIw+QS8qbINwZBfDLs56Zpl3t2mFUYzHfClvWrV D64tMLM/Mm5rdkNQAX5ldMVMh8rw1dXJpfGUlIp0zLJpV59Fi2c39sw0E iS6DqYHhGJOjxtt8QIZO6GNT1e2ZLN0Gd6pshsl70I3ALa+5T533X58hR 7A5eo2I2wUm82iFziO4qtCBpYKPjQx7vQKH+oHtW/yhZ/VaT5wqSIvHCn K6SiWaVOlMS7WQZDpP7cJj2VH96nNZ1gSTAr93yB19azUWUoWRXdf/XhQ Ynaj8/R3kpiuPNsM40nsTNRn/C6fTnxMPp27bqqGJFvMtYQRZAfaiYTqx w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zbqly3kTS0iJjR0Ijs3Xhg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wA85CKvkRqSks3bRqTeXRQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11433"; a="59366817" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,288,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="59366817" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2025 08:32:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /LRnnEpSTMuXggeUjxigKw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ktthpLA7TESE/mgTNTnYWw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,288,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="138128811" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2025 08:32:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 23:53:12 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Daniel P =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , Ilya Leoshkevich , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] target/s390x/kvm/pv: Consolidate OBJECT_DEFINE_SIMPLE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES Message-ID: References: <20250514084957.2221975-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20250514084957.2221975-9-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.11; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -60 X-Spam_score: -6.1 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.686, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org > > +OBJECT_DEFINE_SIMPLE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES(S390PVGuest, > > + s390_pv_guest, > > + S390_PV_GUEST, > > + CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT, > > + { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE }, > > + { NULL }) > > I'll note that existing callers of OBJECT_DEFINE_SIMPLE_TYPE_WITH_INTERFACES > happily ignore the line limit and put it into a single line. > > (which ends up looking better IMHO) Ok, I'll onor the existing conventions (which I'll apply to other patches as well). > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Thanks! Regards, Zhao