From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-rust@nongnu.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] rust/vmstate: Support varray's num field wrapped in BqlCell
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:25:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCb2bvoJQ2NxCkqz@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c44eebb9-1252-447e-9262-e2946f90f01c@redhat.com>
> > HPET currently wraps num_timers in BqlCell<>. Although BqlCell<> is not
> > necessary from strictly speaking, it makes sense for vmstate to respect
> > BqlCell.
>
> Dropping BqlCell<> from num_timers is indeed possible.
Hi Paolo,
I would like to further discuss whether there's any safe issues.
num_timers is a property:
qemu_api::define_property!(
c"timers",
HPETState,
num_timers,
unsafe { &qdev_prop_uint8 },
u8,
default = HPET_MIN_TIMERS
),
Then this means someone could set this property in C side or Rust side
by:
DeviceState *hpet = qdev_new(TYPE_HPET);
qdev_prop_set_uint8(hpet, "timers", 8);
(Though we haven't provide safe interface at Rust side to set property.)
Whatever this happens at C side or Rust side, this depends on QOM core
code (in C) to overwrite the HPETState::num_timers directly.
Then after the call to qdev_prop_set_uint8() starts, all subsequent
processes happen on the C side, so even though the rewriting of num_timers
is runtime, there are no additional safety considerations because it
doesn't cross FFI boundaries. Am I understanding this correctly?
Thanks,
Zhao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-16 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 14:49 [PATCH 0/9] rust/hpet: Initial support for migration Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] rust/vmstate: Support field_exists check in vmstate_struct macro Zhao Liu
2025-04-16 14:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] rust/vmstate: Support varray's num field wrapped in BqlCell Zhao Liu
2025-04-15 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-16 9:43 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-16 12:34 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-16 14:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-16 8:25 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] rust/vmstate_test: Test varray with " Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] rust/vmstate_test: Fix typo in test_vmstate_macro_array_of_pointer_wrapped() Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] rust/timer: Define NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND binding as u64 Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] rust/hpet: convert num_timers to u8 type Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] rust/hpet: convert HPETTimer index " Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] rust/hpet: Support migration Zhao Liu
2025-04-15 12:01 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-15 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-15 17:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-16 10:20 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-16 14:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-04-16 10:33 ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] rust/hpet: Fix a clippy error Zhao Liu
2025-04-15 10:24 ` [PATCH 0/9] rust/hpet: Initial support for migration Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCb2bvoJQ2NxCkqz@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-rust@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).