qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] chardev: Introduce a lock for hup_source
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 12:00:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCsPOyZCu-AcZOI3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250515222014.4161-5-farosas@suse.de>

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:20:14PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> It's possible for the hup_source to have its reference decremented by
> remove_hup_source() while it's still being added to the context,
> leading to asserts in glib:

IIUC this must mean that

  tcp_chr_free_connection

is being called concurrently with

  update_ioc_handlers

I'm wondering if that is really intended, or a sign of a deeper
bug that we'll just paper over if we add the mutex proposed here.

Are you able to provide stack traces showing the 2 concurrent
operations that are triggering this problem ?

> 
> g_source_set_callback_indirect: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get
> (&source->ref_count) > 0'
> 
> g_source_attach: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (&source->ref_count) > 0'
> failed
> 
> Add a lock to serialize removal and creation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
>  chardev/char-socket.c  | 4 ++++
>  chardev/char.c         | 2 ++
>  include/chardev/char.h | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/chardev/char-socket.c b/chardev/char-socket.c
> index d16608f1ed..88db9acd0d 100644
> --- a/chardev/char-socket.c
> +++ b/chardev/char-socket.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,9 @@ static void tcp_chr_free_connection(Chardev *chr)
>          s->read_msgfds_num = 0;
>      }
>  
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>      remove_hup_source(s);
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>  
>      tcp_set_msgfds(chr, NULL, 0);
>      remove_fd_in_watch(chr);
> @@ -613,6 +615,7 @@ static void update_ioc_handlers(SocketChardev *s)
>                                       tcp_chr_read, chr,
>                                       chr->gcontext);
>  
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>      remove_hup_source(s);
>      s->hup_source = qio_channel_create_watch(s->ioc, G_IO_HUP);
>      /*
> @@ -634,6 +637,7 @@ static void update_ioc_handlers(SocketChardev *s)
>      g_source_set_callback(s->hup_source, (GSourceFunc)tcp_chr_hup,
>                            chr, NULL);
>      g_source_attach(s->hup_source, chr->gcontext);
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void tcp_chr_connect(void *opaque)
> diff --git a/chardev/char.c b/chardev/char.c
> index bbebd246c3..d03f698b38 100644
> --- a/chardev/char.c
> +++ b/chardev/char.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ static void char_init(Object *obj)
>      chr->handover_yank_instance = false;
>      chr->logfd = -1;
>      qemu_mutex_init(&chr->chr_write_lock);
> +    qemu_mutex_init(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>  
>      /*
>       * Assume if chr_update_read_handler is implemented it will
> @@ -316,6 +317,7 @@ static void char_finalize(Object *obj)
>          close(chr->logfd);
>      }
>      qemu_mutex_destroy(&chr->chr_write_lock);
> +    qemu_mutex_destroy(&chr->hup_source_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo char_type_info = {
> diff --git a/include/chardev/char.h b/include/chardev/char.h
> index 429852f8d9..064184153d 100644
> --- a/include/chardev/char.h
> +++ b/include/chardev/char.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ struct Chardev {
>      Object parent_obj;
>  
>      QemuMutex chr_write_lock;
> +    QemuMutex hup_source_lock;
>      CharBackend *be;
>      char *label;
>      char *filename;
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-19 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-15 22:20 [PATCH 0/4] chardev: Fix issues found by vhost-user-test Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] chardev: Fix QIOChannel refcount Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-19 10:49   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] chardev: Don't attempt to unregister yank function more than once Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-19 10:52   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] chardev: Consolidate yank registration Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-19 10:53   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] chardev: Introduce a lock for hup_source Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-19 11:00   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-05-19 14:21     ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] chardev: Fix issues found by vhost-user-test Marc-André Lureau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aCsPOyZCu-AcZOI3@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).