qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org,
	eduardo@habkost.net, berrange@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/core/qdev-properties-system: Add missing return in set_drive_helper()
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:57:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEBCxwfX7QQue1FB@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250523070211.280498-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>

Am 23.05.2025 um 09:02 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben:
> Currently, changing the 'drive' property of e.g. a scsi-hd object will
> result in an assertion failure if the aio context of the block node
> it's replaced with doesn't match the current aio context:
> 
> > bdrv_replace_child_noperm: Assertion `bdrv_get_aio_context(old_bs) ==
> > bdrv_get_aio_context(new_bs)' failed.
> 
> The problematic scenario is already detected, but a 'return' statement
> was missing.
> 
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Fixes: d1a58c176a ("qdev: allow setting drive property for realized device")
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> * Add missing condition in commit message, sorry for the noise!

Thanks, applied to the block branch.

But while we're here...

> Reproducer:
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> rm /tmp/disk0.raw
> rm /tmp/disk1.raw
> ./qemu-img create -f raw /tmp/disk0.raw 1G
> ./qemu-img create -f raw /tmp/disk1.raw 1G
> ./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \
> --blockdev file,node-name=node0,filename=/tmp/disk0.raw \
> --blockdev file,node-name=node1,filename=/tmp/disk1.raw \
> --nodefaults \
> --object 'iothread,id=iothread0' \
> --device 'virtio-scsi-pci,id=virtioscsi0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3,iothread=iothread0' \
> --device 'scsi-hd,bus=virtioscsi0.0,scsi-id=1,drive=node0,id=scsi0' \
> <<EOF
> {"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
> {"execute": "qom-set", "arguments": { "path": "/machine/peripheral/scsi0", "property": "drive", "value": "node1" } }
> {"execute": "quit"}
> EOF

...could you put this in a qemu-iotests case as a follow-up? It looks
like we don't have a proper test for qom-set on drive properties yet.

>  hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> index 8e11e6388b..24e145d870 100644
> --- a/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> +++ b/hw/core/qdev-properties-system.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static void set_drive_helper(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>          if (ctx != bdrv_get_aio_context(bs)) {
>              error_setg(errp, "Different aio context is not supported for new "
>                         "node");
> +            return;
>          }
>  
>          blk_replace_bs(blk, bs, errp);

While this is the trivial fix for what was originally meant, I'm not
sure if that's the best way to handle the situation. I would have
expected that we do something similar as in bdrv_attach_child_common()
and try to move @bs into @ctx before failing.

Nowadays, even on failure to move @bs, we don't strictly have to error
out any more since the backends are properly multithreaded. But we
haven't made that change even to bdrv_attach_child_common() yet. I
wonder if we should only do that with a force option.

We don't have to address this now, but it probably doesn't hurt to think
a bit about what we want it to look like in the long run.

Kevin



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23  7:02 [PATCH v2] hw/core/qdev-properties-system: Add missing return in set_drive_helper() Fiona Ebner
2025-05-30 15:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-04 12:57 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEBCxwfX7QQue1FB@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).