From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, walling@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, jrossi@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:58:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aELJ3WYvwZ-hG4E9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604215657.528142-13-zycai@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:56:40PM -0400, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>
> DIAG 508 subcode 1 performs signature-verification on signed components.
> A signed component may be a Linux kernel image, or any other signed
> binary. **Verification of initrd is not supported.**
>
> The instruction call expects two item-pairs: an address of a device
> component, an address of the analogous signature file (in PKCS#7 format),
> and their respective lengths. All of this data should be encapsulated
> within a Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock, with the CertificateStoreInfo
> fields ignored. The DIAG handler will read from the provided addresses
> to retrieve the necessary data, parse the signature file, then
> perform the signature-verification. Because there is no way to
> correlate a specific certificate to a component, each certificate
> in the store is tried until either verification succeeds, or all
> certs have been exhausted.
>
> The subcode value is denoted by setting the second-to-left-most bit of
> a 2-byte field.
>
> A return code of 1 indicates success, and the index and length of the
> corresponding certificate will be set in the CertificateStoreInfo
> portion of the SigVerifBlock. The following values indicate failure:
>
> 0x0202: component data is invalid
> 0x0302: signature is not in PKCS#7 format
> 0x0402: signature-verification failed
>
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index 1ef1eb5299..ca7dd0f2e6 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -526,9 +526,81 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = rc;
> }
>
> +static int handle_diag508_sig_verif(uint64_t addr, size_t csi_size, size_t svb_size,
> + S390IPLCertificateStore *qcs)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + int verified;
> + Error *err;
> + uint64_t comp_len, comp_addr;
> + uint64_t sig_len, sig_addr;
> + g_autofree uint8_t *svb_comp;
> + g_autofree uint8_t *svb_sig;
> + g_autofree Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock *svb;
All g_auto* variables must be initialized to NULL at time
of declaration. As written this results in freeing of
unitialized data if a 'return' is hit before these are
initialized.
> +
> + if (!qcs || !qcs->count) {
> + return DIAG_508_RC_NO_CERTS;
> + }
> +
> + svb = g_new0(Diag508SignatureVerificationBlock, 1);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, svb, svb_size);
> +
> + comp_len = be64_to_cpu(svb->comp_len);
> + comp_addr = be64_to_cpu(svb->comp_addr);
> + sig_len = be64_to_cpu(svb->sig_len);
> + sig_addr = be64_to_cpu(svb->sig_addr);
> +
> + if (!comp_len || !comp_addr) {
> + return DIAG_508_RC_INVAL_COMP_DATA;
> + }
> +
> + if (!sig_len || !sig_addr) {
> + return DIAG_508_RC_INVAL_PKCS7_SIG;
> + }
> +
> + svb_comp = g_malloc0(comp_len);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(comp_addr, svb_comp, comp_len);
> +
> + svb_sig = g_malloc0(sig_len);
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(sig_addr, svb_sig, sig_len);
> +
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_FAIL_VERIF;
> + /*
> + * It is uncertain which certificate contains
> + * the analogous key to verify the signed data
> + */
> + for (int i = 0; i < qcs->count; i++) {
> + err = NULL;
> + verified = qcrypto_verify_x509_cert((uint8_t *)qcs->certs[i].raw,
> + qcs->certs[i].size,
> + svb_comp, comp_len,
> + svb_sig, sig_len, &err);
> +
> + /* return early if GNUTLS is not enabled */
> + if (verified == -ENOTSUP) {
> + break;
> + }
All errors must be honoured not merely missing gnutls, and this code
leaks 'err' too
> +
> + if (verified == 0) {
> + svb->csi.idx = i;
> + svb->csi.len = cpu_to_be64(qcs->certs[i].size);
> + cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, &svb->csi, be32_to_cpu(csi_size));
> + rc = DIAG_508_RC_OK;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 21:56 [PATCH v3 00/28] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] Add boot-certificates to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 14:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-20 15:45 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-24 15:03 ` Jared Rossi
2025-06-30 19:31 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-06 10:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-17 10:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-17 14:57 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-18 5:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-18 15:34 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-23 6:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-23 8:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-23 9:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-30 19:56 ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] s390x: Guest support for Certificate Store Facility (CS) Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for certificate store facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-06 10:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] crypto: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set iplb->len to maximum length of " Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-04 21:56 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] docs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2025-06-06 11:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-06-17 21:29 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aELJ3WYvwZ-hG4E9@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).