From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to .instance_init
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:32:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHCwAXmW0De8ptqK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711000603.438312-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 02:06:03AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:06:03 +0200
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to
> .instance_init
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0
>
> With the reordering of instance_post_init callbacks that is new in 10.1
> accel_cpu_instance_init must execute in .instance_init as is already
> the case for RISC-V. Otherwise, for example, setting the vendor
> property is broken when using KVM or Hypervisor.framework, because
> KVM sets it *after* the user's value is set by DeviceState's
> intance_post_init callback.
>
> Reported-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
no, Intel doesn't deserve this credit. Instead, this bug is reported
from these 2 people:
"Like Xu" <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> - KUT Test
"Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> - PMU Fix
For reference: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/aFpocfTpBLB34N3l@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 0:05 [PATCH 0/4] target/i386: fix position of accel_cpu_instance_init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] target/i386: move max_features to class Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 1:52 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 3:43 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] target/i386: nvmm, whpx: add accel/CPU class that sets host vendor Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:12 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 2:17 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 6:40 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 7:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 5:36 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] target/i386: allow reordering max_x86_cpu_initfn vs accel CPU init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:20 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:08 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to .instance_init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:26 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 6:32 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHCwAXmW0De8ptqK@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).