From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Issues with pdcm in qemu 10.1-rc on migration and save/restore
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 20:18:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJOqmxTimJ_mFCqp@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0L-E=JsKOX_E=jqraeK__jLF851DDbEx5psVkTMSppKXw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 07:57:34PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 2:00 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 01:52:17PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I was unsure if this would be better sent to libvirt or qemu - the
> > > issue is somewhere between libvirt modelling CPUs and qemu 10.1
> > > behaving differently. I did not want to double post and gladly most of
> > > the people are on both lists - since the switch in/out of the problem
> > > is qemu 10.0 <-> 10.1 let me start here. I beg your pardon for not yet
> > > having all the answers, I'm sure I could find more with debugging, but
> > > I also wanted to report early for your awareness while we are still in
> > > the RC phase.
> > >
> > >
> > > # Problem
> > >
> > > What I found when testing migrations in Ubuntu with qemu 10.1-rc1 was:
> > > error: operation failed: guest CPU doesn't match specification:
> > > missing features: pdcm
> > >
> > > This is behaving the same with libvirt 11.4 or the more recent 11.6.
> > > But switching back to qemu 10.0 confirmed that this behavior is new
> > > with qemu 10.1-rc.
> >
> >
> > > Without yet having any hard evidence against them I found a few pdcm
> > > related commits between 10.0 and 10.1-rc1:
> > > 7ff24fb65 i386/tdx: Don't mask off CPUID_EXT_PDCM
> > > 00268e000 i386/cpu: Warn about why CPUID_EXT_PDCM is not available
> > > e68ec2980 i386/cpu: Move adjustment of CPUID_EXT_PDCM before
> > > feature_dependencies[] check
> > > 0ba06e46d i386/tdx: Add TDX fixed1 bits to supported CPUIDs
> > >
> > >
> > > # Caveat
> > >
> > > My test environment is in LXD system containers, that gives me issues
> > > in the power management detection
> > > libvirtd[406]: error from service: GDBus.Error:System.Error.EROFS:
> > > Read-only file system
> > > libvirtd[406]: Failed to get host power management capabilities
> >
> > That's harmless.
>
> Yeah, it always was for me - thanks for confirming.
>
> > > And the resulting host-model on a rather old test server will therefore have:
> > > <cpu mode='custom' match='exact' check='full'>
> > > <model fallback='forbid'>Haswell-noTSX-IBRS</model>
> > > <vendor>Intel</vendor>
> > > <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
> > > <feature policy='disable' name='pdcm'/>
> > > ...
> > >
> > > But that was fine in the past, and the behavior started to break
> > > save/restore or migrations just now with the new qemu 10.1-rc.
> > >
> > > # Next steps
> > >
> > > I'm soon overwhelmed by meetings for the rest of the day, but would be
> > > curious if one has a suggestion about what to look at next for
> > > debugging or a theory about what might go wrong. If nothing else comes
> > > up I'll try to set up a bisect run tomorrow.
> >
> > Yeah, git bisect is what I'd start with.
>
> Bisect complete, identified this commit
>
> commit 00268e00027459abede448662f8794d78eb4b0a4
> Author: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> Date: Tue Mar 4 00:24:50 2025 -0500
>
> i386/cpu: Warn about why CPUID_EXT_PDCM is not available
>
> When user requests PDCM explicitly via "+pdcm" without PMU enabled, emit
> a warning to inform the user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304052450.465445-3-xiaoyao.li@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> target/i386/cpu.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
>
>
> Which is odd as it should only add a warning right?
No, that commit message is misleading.
IIUC mark_unavailable_features() actively blocks usage of the feature,
so it is a functional change, not merely a emitting warning.
It makes me wonder if that commit was actually intended to block the
feature or not, vs merely warning ? CC'ing those involved in the
commit.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-06 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 11:52 Issues with pdcm in qemu 10.1-rc on migration and save/restore Christian Ehrhardt
2025-08-06 12:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-06 17:57 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-08-06 19:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-08-07 3:38 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-08-07 6:37 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-08-07 8:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-08-10 13:07 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-08-19 14:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-20 5:11 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-08-20 9:10 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-09-03 8:38 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-09-03 11:26 ` Hector Cao
2025-09-04 14:35 ` Hector Cao
2025-09-10 11:57 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix cross migration issue with missing features: pdcm, arch-capabilities Hector Cao
2025-09-10 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] target/i386: add compatibility property for arch_capabilities Hector Cao
2025-09-16 8:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-16 8:28 ` Hector Cao
2025-09-23 7:25 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2025-09-10 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] target/i386: add compatibility property for pdcm feature Hector Cao
2025-09-23 7:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Fix cross migration issue with missing features: pdcm, arch-capabilities Paolo Bonzini
2025-09-23 10:08 ` Hector Cao
2025-09-23 10:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-09-23 10:31 ` Hector Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJOqmxTimJ_mFCqp@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).