From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] hpet: move out main counter read into a separate block
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:56:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJoSvxMwms_qDS8-@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250808120137.2208800-5-imammedo@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 02:01:31PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Follow up patche will switch main counter read to
> lock-less mode. As preparation for that move relevant
> branch into a separate top level block to make followup
> patch cleaner/simplier by reducing contextual noise
> when lock-less read is introduced.
>
> no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-08 12:01 [PATCH v3 00/10] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] memory: reintroduce BQL-free fine-grained PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-08 14:36 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 15:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-11 12:08 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:54 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] acpi: mark PMTIMER as unlocked Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:55 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] hpet: switch to fain-grained device locking Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:56 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] hpet: move out main counter read into a separate block Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:56 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] hpet: make main counter read lock-less Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] introduce cpu_test_interrupt() that will replace open coded checks Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 16:31 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-12 15:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-12 16:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] x86: kvm: use cpu_test_interrupt() instead of oppen coding checks Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] kvm: i386: irqchip: take BQL only if there is an interrupt Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] use cpu_test_interrupt() instead of oppen coding checks tree wide Igor Mammedov
2025-08-08 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] tcg: move interrupt caching and single step masking closer to user Igor Mammedov
2025-08-11 5:36 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJoSvxMwms_qDS8-@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).