Re: [PATCH] tests/functional: Use more fine-grained locking when looking for free ports

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> 
> Currently, we have one lock that is held while a test is looking for
> free ports. However, we are also using different ranges for looking
> for free ports nowadays (PORTS_START is based on the PID of the process),
> so instead of using only one lock, we should rather use a lock per
> range instead. This should help to allow running more tests in parallel.
> 
> While we're at it, also create the lock files without executable bit
> (mode is 0o777 by default).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/functional/qemu_test/ports.py | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|