From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Cc: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"clg@redhat.com" <clg@redhat.com>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"ddutile@redhat.com" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	 "joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
	"clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com"
	<clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com>,
	"Tian,  Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"Peng, Chao P" <chao.p.peng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/21] vfio/iommufd: Force creating nested parent domain
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 20:47:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLEi1yjlmdNeJx08@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA3PR11MB9136713B0F6F9DD8D5751294923AA@IA3PR11MB9136.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 01:40:01AM +0000, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >On 8/28/25 11:53 AM, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> >>>> +    /*
> >>>> +     * If vIOMMU supports stage-1 translation, force to create nested
> >>> parent
> >>> I would rather not use another terminology here. You previously used
> >>> hw_nested, I think that's better. Also bear in mind that smmu supports
> >>> S1, S2 and S1+S2 in emulated code.
> >> What about 'nesting parent' to match kernel side terminology, per Nicolin's
> >suggestion:
> >>
> >> In kernel kdoc/uAPI, we use:
> >>  - "nesting parent" for stage-2 object
> >>  - "nested hwpt", "nested domain" for stage-1 object
> >I still think that since you queried the HW_NESTED cap it makes sense to
> >continue using it. This can come along with the kernel terminology though.
> 
> OK, like below, do I understand right?
> 
> +    /*
> +     * If vIOMMU supports stage-1 translation, force to create hw_nested
> +     * (aka. nesting parent in kernel) domain which could be reused by
> +     * vIOMMU to create nested domain.
> +     */
FWIW, while I was targeting the word "nested parent", I think Eric
was commenting on the word "stage-1 translation".
The vSMMU code supports "stage-1", "stage-2", and even "nested" as
its full emulation modes (no HW acceleration). So, any word like
"stage-1 translation" or "nested S1" can be confusing to the vSMMU
folks, as neither of them necessarily means "HW_NESTED" that stands
for "HW-accelerated nested stage-1".
Also, "HW_NESTED" != "nesting parent". They're two different things.
Thus, "force to create hw_nested" isn't accurate. Here, we want to
create a "nesting parent" HWPT. There is no other alternative name,
IMHO, given this is essentially a kernel-defined object.
Anyway, if we all agree on the VIOMMU_FLAG_WANT_NESTING_PARENT, it
is not necessary to have this comment (at least the first part) --
we could still note that the nesting parent HWPT will be reused by
vIOMMU to create nested HWPTs, if you'd like to.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-22  6:40 [PATCH v5 00/21] intel_iommu: Enable stage-1 translation for passthrough device Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/21] intel_iommu: Rename vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry to vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:19   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-08-25  6:01     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/21] hw/pci: Introduce pci_device_get_viommu_cap() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:22   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:13   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 11:22     ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 12:30       ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 12:32         ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 15:30           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28  8:26             ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:06               ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  1:54                 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  3:26                   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-01  2:35                     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-01  2:59                       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-01  3:31                         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/21] intel_iommu: Implement get_viommu_cap() callback Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:23   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/21] vfio: Introduce helper vfio_pci_from_vfio_device() Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 22:40   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-08-25  6:06     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:13   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 11:34   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-01 16:36   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-02  2:12     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/21] vfio/iommufd: Force creating nested parent domain Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:12   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-25  8:28     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:51       ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 11:48   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-28  9:53     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-28 13:00       ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  1:40         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  3:47           ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/21] hw/pci: Export pci_device_get_iommu_bus_devfn() and return bool Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:14   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/21] intel_iommu: Introduce a new structure VTDHostIOMMUDevice Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:17   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-26 17:21   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27  6:45     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27  8:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 16:36     ` Eric Auger
2025-08-27 16:57       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:14   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:17     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  2:57       ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/21] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with IOMMUFD backed device when x-flts=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 11:42   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-28  9:37     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:55   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/21] intel_iommu: Fail passthrough device under PCI bridge if x-flts=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:33   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  5:14     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/21] intel_iommu: Introduce two helpers vtd_as_from/to_iommu_pasid_locked Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 11:36   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  5:33     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  6:30       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-03  7:13         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/21] intel_iommu: Handle PASID entry removal and update Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 14:25   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-01  3:17     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-28 12:05   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  3:31     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  7:58       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  2:37         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 12/21] intel_iommu: Handle PASID entry addition Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 16:22   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-01  9:03     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03  8:52       ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  2:45         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-29  5:46   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 13/21] intel_iommu: Introduce a new pasid cache invalidation type FORCE_RESET Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 16:28   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  5:56     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  9:04     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 14/21] intel_iommu: Stick to system MR for IOMMUFD backed host device when x-fls=on Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-27 17:14   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  6:06   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 15/21] intel_iommu: Bind/unbind guest page table to host Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28  8:37   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:05   ` Yi Liu
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 16/21] intel_iommu: Replay pasid bindings after context cache invalidation Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28  9:43   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:35     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  8:11       ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-09-03 10:18         ` Yi Liu
2025-09-04  6:42           ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 17/21] intel_iommu: Propagate PASID-based iotlb invalidation to host Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:00   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-28 12:11     ` Yi Liu
2025-09-01  8:32     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 18/21] intel_iommu: Replay all pasid bindings when either SRTP or TE bit is changed Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 10:02   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 19/21] vfio: Add a new element bypass_ro in VFIOContainerBase Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 12:47   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 20/21] Workaround for ERRATA_772415_SPR17 Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-22 23:55   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-25  9:21     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-25 16:58       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27  7:11         ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27  8:42           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-27 11:56     ` Yi Liu
2025-08-27 15:09       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-29  8:16         ` Yi Liu
2025-08-29  8:54           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22  6:40 ` [PATCH v5 21/21] intel_iommu: Enable host device when x-flts=on in scalable mode Zhenzhong Duan
2025-08-28 12:51   ` Eric Auger
2025-08-29  7:42   ` Yi Liu
2025-09-16  8:17     ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-08-27 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 00/21] intel_iommu: Enable stage-1 translation for passthrough device Yi Liu
2025-08-28  5:53   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aLEi1yjlmdNeJx08@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).