qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
	"Hailiang Zhang" <zhanghailiang@xfusion.com>,
	"Yury Kotov" <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>,
	"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
	"Zhang Chen" <zhangckid@gmail.com>,
	"Li Zhijian" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
	"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:17:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7f72cc7-d5ec-4a9e-a1a1-d77f376c5ce4@yandex-team.ru>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:29:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > For that, qemu_loadvm_state() and qemu_loadvm_state_main() functions need
> > to now take a "bql_held" parameter saying whether bql is held.  We could
> > use things like BQL_LOCK_GUARD(), but this patch goes with explicit
> > lockings rather than relying on bql_locked TLS variable.  In case of
> > migration, we always know whether BQL is held in different context as long
> > as we can still pass that information downwards.
> 
> Agree, but I think it's better to make new macros following same pattern, i.e.
> 
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
>     action();
> }
> 
> instead of
> 
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held, actions());
> 
> ..
> 
> Or I'm missing something and we already have a precedent of the latter
> notation?

Nop.. it's just that when initially working on that I didn't try as hard to
achieve such pattern.  Here we need to recover the BQL status after the
block, so I didn't immediately see how autoptr would work there.

But I tried slightly harder, I think below should achieve the same pattern
but based on some for() magic.

Thanks for raising this, early comments still be welcomed or I'll go with
that.

===8<===

static inline void
with_bql_held_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
    assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
    if (!bql_held) {
        bql_lock_impl(file, line);
    }
}

static inline void
with_bql_held_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
    assert(bql_locked());
    if (!bql_held) {
        bql_unlock();
    }
}

/**
 * WITH_BQL_HELD(): Run a block of code, making sure BQL is held
 * @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
 *
 * Example use case:
 *
 * WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
 *     // BQL is guaranteed to be held within this block,
 *     // if it wasn't held, will be released when the block finishes.
 * }
 */
#define  WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held)                                \
    for (bool _bql_once = \
             (with_bql_held_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), true);  \
         _bql_once;                                                     \
         _bql_once = (with_bql_held_unlock(bql_held), false))           \

static inline void
with_bql_released_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
    assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
    if (bql_held) {
        bql_unlock();
    }
}

static inline void
with_bql_released_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
    assert(!bql_locked());
    if (bql_held) {
        bql_lock_impl(file, line);
    }
}

/**
 * WITH_BQL_RELEASED(): Run a task, making sure BQL is released
 * @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
 *
 * Example use case:
 *
 * WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held) {
 *     // BQL is guaranteed to be released within this block,
 *     // if it was held, will be re-taken when the block finishes.
 * }
 */
#define  WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held)                                    \
    for (bool _bql_once = (with_bql_released_unlock(bql_held), true);   \
         _bql_once;                                                     \
         _bql_once =                                                    \
             (with_bql_released_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), false)) \

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 20:59 [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] migration/vfio: Remove BQL implication in vfio_multifd_switchover_start() Peter Xu
2025-08-28 18:05   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2025-09-16 21:34   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] migration/rdma: Fix wrong context in qio_channel_rdma_shutdown() Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:41   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26  1:01   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] migration/rdma: Allow qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel work with thread Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:50   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26  1:02   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] migration/rdma: Change io_create_watch() to return immediately Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:35   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 20:34     ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26  2:39   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 20:42     ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 23:51   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-08-29 16:37     ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04  1:38       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-10-08 21:02         ` Peter Xu
2025-08-29  8:29   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:17     ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-09-01  9:35       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-09-17 18:23   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 21:41     ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26  3:41   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 21:10     ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] migration/rdma: Remove coroutine path in qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:39   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:18     ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26  2:44   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] migration/postcopy: Remove workaround on wait preempt channel Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:30   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] migration/ram: Remove workaround on ram yield during load Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:31   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] migration/rdma: Remove rdma_cm_poll_handler Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:38   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:22     ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26  3:38   ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-29  8:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:18   ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04  8:27 ` Zhang Chen
2025-10-08 21:26   ` Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:32 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 16:58   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@treblig.org \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=zhangckid@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanghailiang@xfusion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).