From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Hailiang Zhang" <zhanghailiang@xfusion.com>,
"Yury Kotov" <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
"Zhang Chen" <zhangckid@gmail.com>,
"Li Zhijian" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
"Juraj Marcin" <jmarcin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:17:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7f72cc7-d5ec-4a9e-a1a1-d77f376c5ce4@yandex-team.ru>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:29:59AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > For that, qemu_loadvm_state() and qemu_loadvm_state_main() functions need
> > to now take a "bql_held" parameter saying whether bql is held. We could
> > use things like BQL_LOCK_GUARD(), but this patch goes with explicit
> > lockings rather than relying on bql_locked TLS variable. In case of
> > migration, we always know whether BQL is held in different context as long
> > as we can still pass that information downwards.
>
> Agree, but I think it's better to make new macros following same pattern, i.e.
>
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
> action();
> }
>
> instead of
>
> WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held, actions());
>
> ..
>
> Or I'm missing something and we already have a precedent of the latter
> notation?
Nop.. it's just that when initially working on that I didn't try as hard to
achieve such pattern. Here we need to recover the BQL status after the
block, so I didn't immediately see how autoptr would work there.
But I tried slightly harder, I think below should achieve the same pattern
but based on some for() magic.
Thanks for raising this, early comments still be welcomed or I'll go with
that.
===8<===
static inline void
with_bql_held_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
if (!bql_held) {
bql_lock_impl(file, line);
}
}
static inline void
with_bql_held_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
assert(bql_locked());
if (!bql_held) {
bql_unlock();
}
}
/**
* WITH_BQL_HELD(): Run a block of code, making sure BQL is held
* @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
*
* Example use case:
*
* WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) {
* // BQL is guaranteed to be held within this block,
* // if it wasn't held, will be released when the block finishes.
* }
*/
#define WITH_BQL_HELD(bql_held) \
for (bool _bql_once = \
(with_bql_held_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), true); \
_bql_once; \
_bql_once = (with_bql_held_unlock(bql_held), false)) \
static inline void
with_bql_released_unlock(bool bql_held)
{
assert(bql_held == bql_locked());
if (bql_held) {
bql_unlock();
}
}
static inline void
with_bql_released_lock(bool bql_held, const char *file, int line)
{
assert(!bql_locked());
if (bql_held) {
bql_lock_impl(file, line);
}
}
/**
* WITH_BQL_RELEASED(): Run a task, making sure BQL is released
* @bql_held: Whether BQL is already held
*
* Example use case:
*
* WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held) {
* // BQL is guaranteed to be released within this block,
* // if it was held, will be re-taken when the block finishes.
* }
*/
#define WITH_BQL_RELEASED(bql_held) \
for (bool _bql_once = (with_bql_released_unlock(bql_held), true); \
_bql_once; \
_bql_once = \
(with_bql_released_lock(bql_held, __FILE__, __LINE__), false)) \
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-30 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 20:59 [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] migration/vfio: Remove BQL implication in vfio_multifd_switchover_start() Peter Xu
2025-08-28 18:05 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2025-09-16 21:34 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] migration/rdma: Fix wrong context in qio_channel_rdma_shutdown() Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26 1:01 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] migration/rdma: Allow qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel work with thread Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:50 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-09-26 1:02 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] migration/rdma: Change io_create_watch() to return immediately Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:35 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 20:34 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 2:39 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] migration: Thread-ify precopy vmstate load process Peter Xu
2025-08-27 23:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-08-29 16:37 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04 1:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-10-08 21:02 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-29 8:29 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:17 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-09-01 9:35 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-09-17 18:23 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 21:41 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 3:41 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-10-08 21:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] migration/rdma: Remove coroutine path in qemu_rdma_wait_comp_channel Peter Xu
2025-09-16 22:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:18 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 2:44 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] migration/postcopy: Remove workaround on wait preempt channel Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:30 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] migration/ram: Remove workaround on ram yield during load Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:31 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-08-27 20:59 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] migration/rdma: Remove rdma_cm_poll_handler Peter Xu
2025-09-17 18:38 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-08 21:22 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-26 3:38 ` Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
2025-08-29 8:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] migration: Threadify loadvm process Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-08-29 17:18 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-04 8:27 ` Zhang Chen
2025-10-08 21:26 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-16 21:32 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-09 16:58 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLHgmt7vDbmWCS24@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=zhangckid@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanghailiang@xfusion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).