From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Juraj Marcin <jmarcin@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Apply migration specific keep-alive defaults to inet socket
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:52:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMwqvbFzGlsX23C7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMwg-ROjbDL_z_EM@x1.local>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 03:45:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > There needs to be a way to initiate post-copy recovery regardless
> > of whether we've hit a keepalive timeout. Especially if we can
> > see one QEMU in postcopy-paused, but not the other side, it
> > doesn't appear to make sense to block the recovery process.
> >
> > The virDomainJobCancel command can do a migrate-cancel on the
> > src, but it didn't look like we could do the same on the dst.
> > Unless I've overlooked something, Libvirt needs to gain a way
> > to explicitly force both sides into the postcopy-paused state,
> > and thus be able to immediately initiate recovery.
>
> Right, if libvirt can do that then problem should have been solved too.
>
> > I'm fine with turning on keepalives on the socket, but IMHO the
> > out of the box behaviour should be to honour the kernel default
> > tunables unless the admin decides they want different behaviour.
> > I'm not seeing a rational for why the kernel defaults should be
> > forceably overridden in QEMU out of the box.
>
> IMHO the rational here is that the socket here is in a special state and
> for special purpose. So we're not trying to change anything globally for
> qemu (without knowing what the socket is), but only this specific type of
> socket that is used for either precopy or postcopy live migrations.
>
> It's special because it's always safe to have a more aggresive
> disconnection, and might be preferred versus very lengthy hangs (if
> assuming libvirt doesn't yet have way to stop the hang), especially for a
> postcopy phase.
I've already described up-thread that it is not guaranteed safe to
have aggressive disconnection. It is often safe, but there is
definitely non-negligible risk in prematurely terminating a migration
connection.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 15:01 [PATCH] migration: Apply migration specific keep-alive defaults to inet socket Juraj Marcin
2025-09-09 15:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-09 21:58 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-10 7:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-10 16:36 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-12 10:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-12 15:02 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-15 18:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-15 20:05 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-18 14:16 ` Juraj Marcin
2025-09-18 14:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-18 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-09-18 15:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-09-19 11:59 ` Jiří Denemark
2025-09-19 12:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-19 12:10 ` Jiří Denemark
2025-09-19 12:04 ` Jiří Denemark
2025-09-10 12:05 ` Juraj Marcin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMwqvbFzGlsX23C7@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=jmarcin@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).