From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD84CAC5BB for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 02:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v48xT-0007Z6-6b; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 22:22:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v48xQ-0007WT-HW; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 22:22:12 -0400 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.145]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v48xH-0001EQ-D8; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 22:22:09 -0400 Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390B01D007F7; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 22:21:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Oct 2025 22:21:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1759371705; x=1759458105; bh=j+30Y+qcrT Ic2Yi220jrPi+ylUldv4RrtBJEEKaXUgY=; b=vF+5VDwLlneOlxX5dKS+tabeiv 8XlgFElZJb/jv+HuPtGq0MWmKRKp6YUEqmFhMRYd4bi6gWA7hokWs3xsyoyZ9/US Z6KeH8Y40aOHBxCi2VyTf+cQd9xrfzoKbeSsW9UB6ZMRGrMoFV9KH424+Mg5E7sz 3FbAc/WEmMQYb8hfTYPRwtPDtef9dtj8E8rGTqADD1ngNiLDyK+4wkrQIlT6fqUU 0McL6S9G+MoRtpw3U96dKpIG+K5nbPnv7YaKoQIxMusTcRrtEvlWUtuD7lGwJCnn kVD4lAfbQwbXdmggYMlHh08cTu/Gf0m9aMZsvSb2nYi/+5ZvAwNXfRIbfeQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1759371705; x=1759458105; bh=j+30Y+qcrTIc2Yi220jrPi+ylUldv4RrtBJ EEKaXUgY=; b=rrxVIgeLE/0jtbOwGcYVicz9zQJTF87bjmQkWTk1S2mp7n7nDGp w9pKzBsO54F9ie9LS2s1gcb1rjbMpyNuSyH+CRGvVYQYtWQ9JigdhMFOnvtX6zQS sBQdWk3dcH9BQ9W31rOQAaGFBOHhD+eMbIkqBDEJX3OvF5boeYpENxfTVskoYKP7 X/jCOLIq9VlxXKvA1neo0RbDJQ4MGsbFBFCSkuY+d/HxiMJD12pWz6O1cI9xkz5W NnqICPx5OaZKY4L59T9RHhMzphPmcm4QK25Cvb3th1UKfIZ9jD+idQNevpCM/zqq Tj2IOapMtt+4/HwzAVG+MAUubwJNsvA2Yug== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdekgeekudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlh cuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtuden ucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceophgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfi gtgidrgiihiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejjefgudeghfetvddugffhjeefjeef hffffeefleegudevjeellefffedvffelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgrthhrihgtkhesshhtfigtgidrgiihiidpnhgspghr tghpthhtohepuddtpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegtlhhgsehkrg hougdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghtvghrrdhmrgihuggvlhhlsehlihhnrghrohdr ohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvfiesrghjrdhiugdrrghupdhrtghpthhtoheprg hmihhthhgrshhhsehfsgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehqvghmuhdquggvvhgvlhesnhho nhhgnhhurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepqhgvmhhuqdgrrhhmsehnohhnghhnuhdrohhrgh dprhgtphhtthhopehvihhjrgihkhhhvghmkhgrsehfsgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehj ohgvlhesjhhmshdrihgurdgruhdprhgtphhtthhopehpkhgrrhhthhhikhgvhigrnhduhe dtleesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i68a1478a:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 22:21:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 22:21:43 -0400 From: Patrick Williams To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater Cc: Peter Maydell , Andrew Jeffery , Amithash Prasad , "open list:All patches CC here" , "open list:ASPEED BMCs" , Vijay Khemka , Joel Stanley , Karthikeyan Pasupathi , Peter Delevoryas Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board Message-ID: References: <20200506173035.2154053-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz> <20200506183219.2166987-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz> <0165086d-3ab4-4986-84ff-452984d16153@kaod.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XNcrLs6Jc4wQQXFC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0165086d-3ab4-4986-84ff-452984d16153@kaod.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.12.124.145; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; helo=fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -2 X-Spam_score: -0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.498, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org --XNcrLs6Jc4wQQXFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 07:51:15AM +0200, C=E9dric Le Goater wrote: > Hello Patrick >=20 > Would it be possible to contribute a functional test for this > machine ? >=20 > The request applies to these Facebook machines : >=20 > sonorapass-bmc This machine type is deprecated and never went to production. > yosemitev2-bmc > tiogapass-bmc > fuji-bmc > fby35-bmc All of these are used by OpenBMC and/or Meta for QEMU validation of new BMC images. I can get you an image for these if necessary. >=20 > Since these machines contribute little to the Aspeed models, > their value lies in the firmware they can run to exercise the > models. Without functional tests, I plan to schedule their > removal in the QEMU 10.2 cycle. I don't understand this statement. What does "little value to the Aspeed models" have to do with keeping machines in place. If we are only going to have support for machines that you deem as "valuable" why would anyone contribute a new machine? Is this a new policy that QEMU only wants specific machine models for any particular SOC? > The fby35-bmc value is in its multisoc nature. We now have the > ast2700fc available as its replacement We actually don't use the multisoc aspect of this machine. I'd be fine if we drop those pieces specifically but the general "can the BMC image boot" is regularly used. --=20 Patrick Williams --XNcrLs6Jc4wQQXFC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmjd4bUACgkQqwNHzC0A wRnZYw/+NrLkjuYUl73xo7q438D0K0dBioy4mMnSU2h1WDi4xT2Zu89n0dI62Kus 4JcSutRKtwoXNC7/6Ky731tsyfzjdg7h+GvcT0IKfbOtDZu78qQJW/j8Lo8TkXqU EChgMJq+8n/8zVJMbE1gOEcHhgBlSWFB+QJOtbNzgaFgcCwi42D6S0P2M5E5ne+R cvNbJHTCPSa8W0yNV2j6FFyO00bH8xRDitM6O8WHDDbSLrkqtVfnh50KzG26nSuL BZcVWfgdIv/KLAbdf+yhKRt+WfBIPDZan3gcN9EgK6vqL6doKnRCl5bAVMH3hVTJ ad2IGBVICa33rPPiqcfjDir3ISHPgmrHnUGkRfM3tF7zvW6LV/3YX/qEeNELCgpx a2xcUHtIKAreygwYLPr2I78B1crfpJ6sUQPv66j9Ppa2Djf+iHy/wyojpskO1U+m 4D36+VCqfhU6tz3qsInyoFu7zyP5+z8GdEqOglcT5q7DKLorXTeEsDihIlGoPdCB +aVmAMA2c0rUnNmqbWI4gYWh1B/V9v1J+5S9tFudgKcqRz8ZkHj/NQiZEaPah9yl DB/ACgpTvDK6+XT1rSu7Up2R71N5L2eqg/F29/qMx716kenQj/Vi8meMRFwra/jO t5uaoGhQl7KpJy49Zpm36dANKovU8H43kgmDYJEDEzAOTLd3B0U= =DtZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XNcrLs6Jc4wQQXFC--