From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56CCCAC5B8 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4ECD-0007Ib-Kh; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:57:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4EC9-0007E5-Ht for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:57:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4EBt-0005Kf-Ja for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:57:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759391835; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8Hde1WAEVjZaTnLU+JZolMy3480J2aMOChYGhpmr16w=; b=TmapDPt8oGi0MH7RZHqi2xjbAt0RRo0X5umiCf7BMti40rXhwwAmJ1Hd3qQ2AGHPjbsXe5 cdhQGEdB4spejJIy6YXfp5szDCiVI0TZaXo+dEyP5Xk0b3PLbXVMohNCcFGKqPJn3cakz5 sOgKfbk5gVwce/5UbPbYAqRsJHC5UYY= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-492-_aqBhMJ9MtWl2qyWUUBY8g-1; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 03:57:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _aqBhMJ9MtWl2qyWUUBY8g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: _aqBhMJ9MtWl2qyWUUBY8g_1759391829 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A7D1800452; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.93]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1F730002C6; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 07:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:56:57 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Magnus Kulke Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Cameron Esfahani , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , Wei Liu , Cornelia Huck , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Roman Bolshakov , Phil Dennis-Jordan , Marcel Apfelbaum , Zhao Liu , Eduardo Habkost , Magnus Kulke , Wei Liu , Eric Blake , Yanan Wang , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 27/27] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers for mshv accelerator Message-ID: References: <20250916164847.77883-1-magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com> <20250916164847.77883-28-magnuskulke@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.14 (2025-02-20) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.518, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Magnus Kulke wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 01:23:31PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Do you need separate groupings ? If the maintainers are the same in both > > cases, and changes are liable to span both accel/mshv and target/i386/mshv > > dir, then perhaps 'target/i386/mshv/' is fine being listed under the > > 'MSHV' group ? > > that's true. however, there is work ongoing to add MSHV support to other > targets, so eventually it wouldn't be the same maintainers for both. Ok, that's sounds fine then. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|