From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD635CAC5B0 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 14:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4Jy9-00070k-2i; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 10:07:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4Jy5-0006zd-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 10:07:37 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1v4Jxr-0006nX-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 10:07:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1759414036; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dtf9YV9BRlgkwczkSqVAyScuQ/cWmObreww11fav380=; b=flSD8LK3G5joJhhstmHX5VfykJKv5hZw0y1OGfFxE+iwY7bKkmYg280nd/OHmXgyJxN0LP VVrUqfrIIJknv+aBXoXrUGirYwDWCe2f3LDbskM/pTjzF8115wa6WH9WpfIog27za7ZOsq iMjjmRtVwdqzfWkN5m3Kk2w8AJyjWKk= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-574-fRoXnDkINPiAeNIrZQmlBQ-1; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 10:07:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fRoXnDkINPiAeNIrZQmlBQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: fRoXnDkINPiAeNIrZQmlBQ_1759414034 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDADC18002C8; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 14:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.45.225.182]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5A1300018D; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 14:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 16:07:09 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Czenczek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tests/qemu-iotest: Add more image formats to the thorough testing Message-ID: References: <20250910153727.226217-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20250910153727.226217-4-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250910153727.226217-4-thuth@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.451, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 10.09.2025 um 17:37 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: > From: Thomas Huth > > Now that the "check" script is a little bit smarter with providing > a list of tests that are supported for an image format, we can also > add more image formats that can be used for generic block layer > testing. (Note: qcow1 and luks are not added because some tests > there currently fail, and other formats like bochs, cloop, dmg and > vvfat do not work with the generic tests and thus would only get > skipped if we'd tried to add them here) > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf