From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13540CCF9EB for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vDPhm-0003tv-6T; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:04:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vDPhc-0003ql-Jn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:04:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vDPhY-0002oA-IC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:04:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761581039; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=trTStwKnlra4QQRolocHgPFrK0UqaJUDD9Vk49wb6nI=; b=LKHowrRrwE8anEiODSaoagn6hjJavKuTd6pfPkkbIfRzt+JtrlFoNC/t5+n99zU7fhxHMF h+T2RQ3lEdxa47HkdO7JmIWNZpm8c+uqy3ETv27LXvCUJdmbsiJ5zSk1IzaqGp7XIFMawM hWI9mcZfhXB8vzGWkdmNr7hOKH2UfM4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-227-hU9CitkeMVaH2lqgF95DqQ-1; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:03:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hU9CitkeMVaH2lqgF95DqQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: hU9CitkeMVaH2lqgF95DqQ_1761580994 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346AD19540E7; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.37]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8235F180057E; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:03:08 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Fiona Ebner Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, fam@euphon.net, stefanha@redhat.com, hreitz@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] block: refresh filter parents when child was resized Message-ID: References: <20250917115509.401015-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250917115509.401015-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 17.09.2025 um 13:54 hat Fiona Ebner geschrieben: > Changes in v2: > * Check for BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED rather than bs->drv->is_filter which > is more generic and for example, also covers the case when the > child of a 'raw' node is resized. > * Expand commit message for main patch, i.e. 3/5. > * Add test for resizing the filtered 'file' node of a 'raw' node. > > Resizing a node below a filter would result in the filter still > reporting the old size. Implement a 'resize' callback for the > child_of_bds class, that refreshes filter parents recursively. Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin