From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Bin Guo" <guobin@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, farosas@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration: Don't free the reason after calling migrate_add_blocker
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:17:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPumkKBx4PoGSwNv@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v7k4xuhk.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 04:08:39PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> But wow, the migrate_add_blocker API design is unpleasant with its
> >> pair of "Error **" parameters - it is practically designed to
> >> maximise confusion & surprise.
> >
> > It's quite a sight, isn't it?
> >
> > I'll give it a quick Friday afternoon try.
>
> Alright, my confusion has been maximised. Giving up on this.
Besides the use of two Error** that might be confusing, what is more
confusing (if not wrong..): migrate_add_blocker() will take ownership of
the 1st Error**, no matter whether the helper succeeded or not. However, it
only resets the first Error** if failed.
I think it means if migrate_add_blocker() succeeded, the caller will have a
non-NULL pointer, even if it has lost the ownership of that pointer.
I'm guessing it never caused issue only because we don't usually
error_free() the migration blocker anywhere.. but I think maybe we should
at least do an error_copy() in add_blockers()..
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 9:28 [PATCH] migration: Don't free the reason after calling migrate_add_blocker Bin Guo
2025-10-24 11:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 11:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-24 13:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 14:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-24 16:17 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-10-24 16:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-24 18:15 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-27 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-10-27 12:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-10-27 13:54 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-10-24 11:53 ` Bin Guo
2025-10-24 13:40 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPumkKBx4PoGSwNv@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=guobin@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).