From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com, farosas@suse.de,
peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: g_autoptr(Error) (was: [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:25:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSWSLMi6ZhTCS_p2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871plmk1bc.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 08:40:07AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> g_autoptr(T) is quite useful when the object's extent matches the
> function's.
>
> This isn't the case for an Error object the function propagates to its
> caller. It is the case for an Error object the function reports or
> handles itself. However, the functions to report Error also free it.
>
> Thus, g_autoptr(Error) is rarely applicable. We have just three
> instances out of >1100 local Error variables, all in migration code.
>
> Two want to move the error to the MigrationState for later handling /
> reporting. Since migrate_set_error() doesn't move, but stores a copy,
> the original needs to be freed, and g_autoptr() is correct there. We
> have 17 more that instead manually free with error_free() or
> error_report_err() right after migrate_set_error().
>
> We recently discussed storing a copy vs. move the original:
>
> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] migration: Error fixes and improvements
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:03:37 -0500
> Message-ID: <aRtHWbWcTh3OF2wY@x1.local>
>
> The two g_autoptr() gave me pause when I investigated this topic, simply
> because they deviate from the common pattern migrate_set_error(s, err)
> followed by error_free() or error_report_err().
>
> The third one became wrong when I cleaned up the reporting (missed in
> the cleanup patch, fixed in the patch I'm replying to). I suspect my
> mistake escaped review for the same reason I made it: g_autoptr(Error)
> is unusual and not visible in the patch hunk.
>
> Would you like me to replace the two correct uses of g_autoptr(Error) by
> more common usage?
I had previously proposed g_autoptr(Error) a year or two back and you
rejected it then, so I'm surprised to see that it got into the code,
because it requires explicit opt-in via a G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC.
Unfortunately it appears exactly that was added earlier this year in
commit 18eb55546a54e443d94a4c49286348176ad4b00a
Author: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date: Tue Mar 4 23:03:35 2025 +0100
error: define g_autoptr() cleanup function for the Error type
Automatic memory management helps avoid memory safety issues.
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/a5843c5fa64d7e5239a4316092ec0ef0d10c2320.1741124640.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
When removing this usage, ensure that commit is reverted too, which
will prevent anyone unwittingly re-introducing g_autoptr(Error)
usage
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 7:05 [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 7:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 15:41 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-25 7:12 ` Marc-André Lureau
2025-11-25 12:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 15:47 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-25 18:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 19:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-26 6:12 ` Should functions that free memory clear the pointer? (was: [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-26 8:21 ` Should functions that free memory clear the pointer? Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-25 7:16 ` [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-11-25 7:40 ` g_autoptr(Error) (was: [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 11:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-11-25 11:46 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 16:15 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Xu
2025-11-25 19:02 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-25 20:49 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Xu
2025-11-26 8:19 ` g_autoptr(Error) Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-26 10:26 ` g_autoptr(Error) Cédric Le Goater
2025-11-26 11:46 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-26 12:00 ` g_autoptr(Error) Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-11-26 12:41 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-11-26 13:27 ` g_autoptr(Error) Peter Maydell
2025-11-26 14:01 ` g_autoptr(Error) Markus Armbruster
2025-12-02 8:34 ` [PATCH] migration: Fix double-free on error path Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSWSLMi6ZhTCS_p2@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).