From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/23] i386/kvm: Initialize x86_ext_save_areas[] based on KVM support
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:30:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTAfaIPST8skLrUs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aS/uGsU39/ZbXDij@intel.com>
> > Can you move the call to kvm_cpu_xsave_init() after
> > x86_cpu_enable_xsave_components()? Is it used anywhere before the CPU is
> > running?
>
> Yes, this is an "ugly" palce. I did not fully defer the initialization
> of the xstate array earlier also because I observed that both HVF and
> TCG have similar xsave initialization interfaces within their accelerator's
> cpu_instance_init() function.
>
> I think it might be better to do the same thing for HVF & TCG as well
> (i.e., defer xstate initialization). Otherwise, if we only modify QEMU
> KVM logic, it looks a bit fragmented... What do you think?
Ah, kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid() currently caches the obtained CPUID.
Delaying xstate initialization would require refreshing the previously
cached old CPUID... This makes the cost of delaying xstate
initialization higher, and I think this way becames not appropriate.
Either keep the current different ways, or back to use host_cpuid for
everything :( . Which do you think is better?
Regards,
Zhao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 3:42 [PATCH v4 00/23] i386: Support CET for KVM Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] i386/cpu: Clean up indent style of x86_ext_save_areas[] Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] i386/cpu: Clean up arch lbr xsave struct and comment Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] i386/cpu: Reorganize arch lbr structure definitions Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] i386/cpu: Make ExtSaveArea store an array of dependencies Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] i386/cpu: Add avx10 dependency for Opmask/ZMM_Hi256/Hi16_ZMM Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] i386/kvm: Initialize x86_ext_save_areas[] based on KVM support Zhao Liu
2025-12-01 16:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-12-03 8:00 ` Zhao Liu
2025-12-03 11:30 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] i386/cpu: Use x86_ext_save_areas[] for CPUID.0XD subleaves Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] i386/cpu: Reorganize dependency check for arch lbr state Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] i386/cpu: Drop pmu check in CPUID 0x1C encoding Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] i386/cpu: Fix supervisor xstate initialization Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] i386/cpu: Add missing migratable xsave features Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] i386/cpu: Enable xsave support for CET states Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] i386/cpu: Add CET support in CR4 Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] i386/cpu: Save/restore SSP0 MSR for FRED Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] i386/kvm: Add save/restore support for CET MSRs Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] i386/kvm: Add save/restore support for KVM_REG_GUEST_SSP Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] i386/cpu: Migrate MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP for FRED and CET-SHSTK Zhao Liu
2025-12-01 17:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-12-03 8:01 ` Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] i386/machine: Add vmstate for cet-shstk and cet-ibt Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] i386/cpu: Mark cet-u & cet-s xstates as migratable Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] i386/cpu: Advertise CET related flags in feature words Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] i386/cpu: Enable cet-ss & cet-ibt for supported CPU models Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] i386/tdx: Fix missing spaces in tdx_xfam_deps[] Zhao Liu
2025-11-18 3:42 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] i386/tdx: Add CET SHSTK/IBT into the supported CPUID by XFAM Zhao Liu
2025-12-01 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 00/23] i386: Support CET for KVM Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTAfaIPST8skLrUs@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).