From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: "Alexandr Moshkov" <dtalexundeer@yandex-team.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Raphael Norwitz" <raphael@enfabrica.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] vhost-user-blk: support inflight migration
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:20:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTmP28XK0X1rvJRv@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8bff5ea-e1c3-4d4c-9ef7-93fa530bff0d@yandex-team.ru>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:41:20PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Yes, it can. And regardless of the way we chose: qdev properties or qapi,
> I don't think we need a property for backend itself. We need a property
> (or migration capability) for vhost-user-blk itself, saying that its
> backend should be migrated.
The problem is then we need to introduce the new property to all frontends
that would support the backend? If it's a backend property, it can be one
property for the backend that all the frontends can consume.
>
> It's a lot simpler to migrate backend inside of frontend state. If we
> migrate backend in separate, we can't control the order of backend/frontend
> stats, and will have to implement some late point in state load process,
> where both are already loaded and we can do our post-load logic.
Would MigrationPriority help when defining the VMSD?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-10 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 10:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] vhost-user-blk: support inflight migration Alexandr Moshkov
2025-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vmstate: introduce VMSTATE_VBUFFER_UINT64 Alexandr Moshkov
2025-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vhost: add vmstate for inflight region with inner buffer Alexandr Moshkov
2025-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vhost-user-blk: support inter-host inflight migration Alexandr Moshkov
2025-11-18 20:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] vhost-user-blk: support " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-11-18 22:05 ` Peter Xu
2025-12-04 19:55 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-12-09 16:51 ` Peter Xu
2025-12-10 11:41 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2025-12-10 15:20 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-12-10 15:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTmP28XK0X1rvJRv@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dtalexundeer@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael@enfabrica.net \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).