Re: [Virtio-fs] virtiofsd: Any reason why there's not an "openat2" sandbox mode?

["Colin Walters" <walters@verbum.org>]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> So rust version of virtiofsd, already supports running unprivileged
> (inside a user namespace).

I know, but as I already said, the use case here is running inside an OpenShift unprivileged pod where *we are already in a container*.

> host$ podman unshare -- virtiofsd --socket-path=/tmp/vfsd.sock 
> --shared-dir /mnt \
>         --announce-submounts --sandbox chroot &

Yes, but in current OCP 4.11 our seccomp policy denies CLONE_NEWUSER:

```
$ unshare -m
unshare: unshare failed: Function not implemented
```

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/security/seccomp-profiles.html

> I think only privileged operation it needs is assigning a range of
> subuid/subgid to the uid you are using on host.

We also turn on NO_NEW_PRIVILEGES by default in OCP pods.  

Now, I *could* in general get elevated permissions where I need to today.  But it's also really important to me to have a long term goal of having operating system builds and tests work well as "just another workload" in our production container platform (now, one *does* want to bind in /dev/kvm, but that's generally safe, and even that strictly speaking is optional if one can stomach the ~10x perf hit).

> Can you give rust virtiofsd (unprivileged) a try.

I admit to not actually trying it in a pod, but I think we all agree it can't work, and the only thing that can today is openat2.