qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] scsi/scsi_bus: fix races in REPORT LUNS
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 12:15:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa3c42a6d304b6f8f07b3293cc5f470116e230aa.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200831150124.206267-10-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 18:01 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Currently scsi_target_emulate_report_luns iterates
> over child devices list twice, and there is guarantee, that
> it will not be changed meanwhile.
> 
> This reason for two loops is that it needs to know how much memory
> to allocate.
> 
> Avoid this by iterating once, and allocating the memory for the output
> dynamically with reserving enought memory so that in practice it won't
> be reallocated often.
Just too many spelling/grammar mistakes in the commit message. Sorry about that.

It should be something like that:

Currently scsi_target_emulate_report_luns iterates over the child device list
twice, and there is no guarantee that this list is the same in both iterations.

The reason for iterating twise is that the first iteration calculates 
how much memory to allocate.

However if we use a dynamic array we can avoid iterating twice, and therefore
we avoid this race.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


> 
> Bugzilla for reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866707
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> index feab20b76d..150dee2e6a 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c
> @@ -438,19 +438,25 @@ struct SCSITargetReq {
>  static void store_lun(uint8_t *outbuf, int lun)
>  {
>      if (lun < 256) {
> +        /* Simple logical unit addressing method*/
> +        outbuf[0] = 0;
>          outbuf[1] = lun;
> -        return;
> +    } else {
> +        /* Flat space addressing method */
> +        outbuf[0] = 0x40 | (lun >> 8);
> +        outbuf[1] = (lun & 255);
>      }
> -    outbuf[1] = (lun & 255);
> -    outbuf[0] = (lun >> 8) | 0x40;
>  }
>  
>  static bool scsi_target_emulate_report_luns(SCSITargetReq *r)
>  {
>      BusChild *kid;
> -    int i, len, n;
>      int channel, id;
> -    bool found_lun0;
> +    uint8_t tmp[8] = {0};
> +    int len = 0;
> +
> +    /* reserve space for 63 LUNs*/
> +    GByteArray *buf = g_byte_array_sized_new(512);
>  
>      if (r->req.cmd.xfer < 16) {
>          return false;
> @@ -460,46 +466,36 @@ static bool scsi_target_emulate_report_luns(SCSITargetReq *r)
>      }
>      channel = r->req.dev->channel;
>      id = r->req.dev->id;
> -    found_lun0 = false;
> -    n = 0;
>  
> -    rcu_read_lock();
>  
> -    QTAILQ_FOREACH_RCU(kid, &r->req.bus->qbus.children, sibling) {
> -        DeviceState *qdev = kid->child;
> -        SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(qdev);
> +    /* add size (will be updated later to correct value */
> +    g_byte_array_append(buf, tmp, 8);
> +    len += 8;
>  
> -        if (dev->channel == channel && dev->id == id) {
> -            if (dev->lun == 0) {
> -                found_lun0 = true;
> -            }
> -            n += 8;
> -        }
> -    }
> -    if (!found_lun0) {
> -        n += 8;
> -    }
> -
> -    scsi_target_alloc_buf(&r->req, n + 8);
> +    /* add LUN0 */
> +    g_byte_array_append(buf, tmp, 8);
> +    len += 8;
>  
> -    len = MIN(n + 8, r->req.cmd.xfer & ~7);
> -    memset(r->buf, 0, len);
> -    stl_be_p(&r->buf[0], n);
> -    i = found_lun0 ? 8 : 16;
> +    rcu_read_lock();
>      QTAILQ_FOREACH_RCU(kid, &r->req.bus->qbus.children, sibling) {
>          DeviceState *qdev = kid->child;
>          SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(qdev);
>  
> -        if (dev->channel == channel && dev->id == id) {
> -            store_lun(&r->buf[i], dev->lun);
> -            i += 8;
> +        if (dev->channel == channel && dev->id == id && dev->lun != 0) {
> +            store_lun(tmp, dev->lun);
> +            g_byte_array_append(buf, tmp, 8);
> +            len += 8;
>          }
>      }
> -
>      rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -    assert(i == n + 8);
> -    r->len = len;
> +    r->buf_len = len;
> +    r->buf = g_byte_array_free(buf, FALSE);
> +    r->len = MIN(len, r->req.cmd.xfer & ~7);
> +
> +    /* store the LUN list length */
> +    stl_be_p(&r->buf[0], len - 8);
> +
>      return true;
>  }
>  




  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-01  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-31 15:01 [PATCH v4 0/9] Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] rcu: Implement drain_call_rcu Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] device_core: use drain_call_rcu in in hmp_device_del/qmp_device_add Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] device-core: use RCU for list of childs of a bus Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi/scsi-bus: scsi_device_find: don't return unrealized devices Maxim Levitsky
2020-09-08 15:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-09  8:15     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] scsi/scsi_bus: Add scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] virtio-scsi: use scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-08-31 15:01 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] scsi/scsi_bus: fix races in REPORT LUNS Maxim Levitsky
2020-09-01  9:15   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-09-08 15:27   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-09  8:20     ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-09-11 15:12       ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa3c42a6d304b6f8f07b3293cc5f470116e230aa.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).