From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47530) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpd4l-0004Ho-PI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:21:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpd4g-0005Xr-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:21:15 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:60191 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpd4g-0005Wo-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:21:10 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v86GJvVj037903 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:21:08 -0400 Received: from e15.ny.us.ibm.com (e15.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.205]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2cth6xe473-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:21:08 -0400 Received: from localhost by e15.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:21:08 -0400 References: <20170904154316.4148-1-david@redhat.com> <67bc4b1b-d934-dff6-9ce6-f5f34c11c9ca@de.ibm.com> <58b1ddef-e588-b976-824e-ed537740ad3a@redhat.com> From: Matthew Rosato Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:21:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58b1ddef-e588-b976-824e-ed537740ad3a@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/19] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: thuth@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost , cohuck@redhat.com, Richard Henderson , Alexander Graf On 09/06/2017 12:03 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 05.09.2017 09:51, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> I think we certainly want to have device_add as well (as long as the old >> interface stays for a while). >> >> Adding Matt. Can you have a look at the cpu hotplug bits? > > If there is no further feedback, I'll be sending a new version out > tomorrow, including the suggested changes. In addition, I'll be > including support to hotplug VCPUs in random order (2 additional patches). > Hi David, just returning from vacation -- Will look at this set today. Matt