From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: jdurgin@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] rbd: Don't limit length of parameter values
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:34:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaca538c-40b7-4957-5118-76cf79f43978@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490377482-13337-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2301 bytes --]
On 03/24/2017 12:44 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We laboriously enforce parameter values are between one and some
> arbitrary limit in length. Only RBD_MAX_IMAGE_NAME_SIZE comes from
> librbd.h, and I'm not sure it applies. Where the other limits come
> from is unclear.
>
> Drop the length checking. The limits librbd actually imposes must be
> checked by librbd anyway.
And if librbd is NOT doing proper length checks, the bug lies there, not
in qemu.
>
> There's one minor complication: BDRVRBDState member name is a
> fixed-size array. Depends on the length limit. Make it a pointer to
> a dynamically allocated string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/rbd.c | 91 ++++++++++---------------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
Wow - you weren't kidding about the checks being laborious.
> -static char *qemu_rbd_next_tok(int max_len,
> - char *src, char delim,
> - const char *name,
> - char **p, Error **errp)
> +static char *qemu_rbd_next_tok(char *src, char delim, char **p)
Getting rid of the forced length means we can't fail - nice.
> @@ -184,27 +161,15 @@ static void qemu_rbd_parse_filename(const char *filename, QDict *options,
> qdict_put(options, "pool", qstring_from_str(found_str));
>
> if (strchr(p, '@')) {
> - found_str = qemu_rbd_next_tok(RBD_MAX_IMAGE_NAME_SIZE, p,
> - '@', "object name", &p, &local_err);
> - if (local_err) {
> - goto done;
> - }
> + found_str = qemu_rbd_next_tok(p, '@', &p);
> qemu_rbd_unescape(found_str);
> qdict_put(options, "image", qstring_from_str(found_str));
Unrelated to your patch, and doesn't hold you up, but I'd love to
eventually get in my patch that shortens this pattern to:
qdict_put_str(options, "image", found_str);
(I still need to find time to write up a Coccinelle script to automate
the task; it's 2.10 material now)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-24 17:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 0/9] rbd: Clean up API and code Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/9] rbd: Reject -blockdev server.*.{numeric, to, ipv4, ipv6} Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:05 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 2/9] rbd: Fix to cleanly reject -drive without pool or image Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:23 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 3/9] rbd: Don't limit length of parameter values Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:34 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/9] rbd: Clean up after the previous commit Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:44 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 5/9] rbd: Don't accept -drive driver=rbd, keyvalue-pairs= Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:53 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 6/9] rbd: Clean up runtime_opts, fix -drive to reject filename Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 18:55 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 7/9] rbd: Clean up qemu_rbd_create()'s detour through QemuOpts Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 8/9] rbd: Rewrite the code to extract list-valued options Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 19:03 ` Eric Blake
2017-03-24 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 9/9] rbd: Reject invalid authentication methods Markus Armbruster
2017-03-24 19:05 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaca538c-40b7-4957-5118-76cf79f43978@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).