From: Geoffrey McRae <geoff@hostfission.com>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "José Pekkarinen" <koalinux@gmail.com>,
kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Autoconnect jack ports by default
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:38:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab566e57c5ec57e857834d7a70d4dfde@hostfission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31652865.Htn8XJslzA@silver>
While I get where you're coming from, those using QEMU with Jack are
already advanced users that are used to reading technical documentation.
Having our one client do something that is unexpected/different would
not only confuse existing Jack users but also anyone following any
guides/documentation on how to use a generic jack client. IMO the better
solution here is simply better documentation, perhaps even a known
working sample setup.
On 2021-02-25 09:33, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2021 23:04:47 CET Geoffrey McRae wrote:
>> This goes against how all standard jack clients work, a new jack
>> client
>> should not auto-connect at all unless explicitly configured to as if
>> there is an existing audio diagram configured (which is 99% of the
>> time)
>> it will cause unexpected/undesired behavior.
>>
>> Jack is not supposed to be an 'automatic' system, it's the
>> responsibility of the patch bay software to route connections.
>>
>> The auto-connect feature exists to allow the jack audiodev to
>> re-connect
>> a broken connection when the jack device restarts/reconnects.
>
> Well, that was also my idea first, and I would agree with you in case
> of a
> regular music app of course, but then I thought QEMU is probably not an
> average JACK client, and it simply lowers the entry level for new users
> who
> probably just want to output to system out anyway.
>
> I mean, are you piping QEMU into Ardour or something Geoffrey?
>
> This could still be overridden by passing a bogus pattern with argument
> "connect-ports" for people who prefer the patchbay approach in the end.
Sorry but this is a kludge to reverse another kludge, I really don't
think this is a good way to go.
>
> So I would vote for the "make it easy for newbies" approach in this
> case, but
> I leave that up to you and Gerd to decide. :)
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-24 19:19 [PATCH v2] Autoconnect jack ports by default José Pekkarinen
2021-02-24 19:39 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 22:04 ` Geoffrey McRae
2021-02-24 22:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 22:38 ` Geoffrey McRae [this message]
2021-02-25 8:31 ` José Ramón Muñoz Pekkarinen
2021-02-25 8:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-02-26 11:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-03 7:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-03-04 11:24 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-04 11:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-03-04 13:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-03-04 13:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-03-04 14:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab566e57c5ec57e857834d7a70d4dfde@hostfission.com \
--to=geoff@hostfission.com \
--cc=koalinux@gmail.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).