From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95570C5ACD6 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B24620663 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:27:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B24620663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43660 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEMYD-0002yW-Le for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:27:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEMUS-00087C-Hp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:23:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEMUQ-0006yk-P5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:23:19 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:55569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEMUQ-0006pC-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:23:18 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 9m7Z04/hM7cxD5+7e1RrAxH6ci5duohZDlGOFL2vuLC96DKRz4rYGWh1aRr7ZyWs/SvD/YMNWJ mgUgkT4gEMkg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2020 17:23:14 -0700 IronPort-SDR: AK0VJkZQXsILYkl8HHmjXK9q+vBoe2ZAWfSylQagnbvid0EsduBc99jhLDWhSphuvryInl2ke0 Mu9uW0d+oTGg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,565,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="391256814" Received: from coxu-arch-shz.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.160.52]) ([10.239.160.52]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2020 17:23:13 -0700 Subject: Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1584394048-44994-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1584394048-44994-10-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <41756673-bbd4-593f-ade8-3232db8b512e@intel.com> <1eead546-c06f-2ec0-e3b7-fdc5bb426620@redhat.com> From: Colin Xu Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:23:12 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1eead546-c06f-2ec0-e3b7-fdc5bb426620@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 192.55.52.43 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Colin.Xu@intel.com Cc: Wenchao Wang , Hang Yuan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2020-03-17 18:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 17/03/20 09:55, Colin Xu wrote: >> On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: >>>> Hi Paolo, >>>> >>>> For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other >>>> reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it >>>> together with other patches? >>> As you prefer.  I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) >>> >>> Paolo >> Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier >> to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. >> We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and >> send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. >> >> What do you think? > Sure, that's okay. The number of patches is low enough. > > Paolo Cool. Thanks a lot for the help. Colin. -- Best Regards, Colin Xu