From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxD2H-0005kL-FU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxD2C-0006xS-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:29 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:42891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxD2C-0006x6-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:24 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u9KD428g027303 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:17 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 266x58hehp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:16 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:14 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE63117D8063 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:07:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u9KD5BYt18022652 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:05:11 GMT Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u9KD5BSB028359 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:05:11 -0400 References: <20161018105724.26520-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161018105724.26520-3-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161018132728.GH2190@work-vm> <20161018135426.GJ2190@work-vm> <20161018183228.GA22395@work-vm> <6e59d1a0-ec0c-2f23-e3d2-4c7a77c2b690@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161020120048.GH2039@work-vm> From: Halil Pasic Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:05:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161020120048.GH2039@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] tests/test-vmstate.c: prove VMStateField.start broken List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Amit Shah , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "quintela@redhat.com Guenther Hutzl" On 10/20/2016 02:00 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: >> Should I send a v2 with the two questionable patches (the failing test >> > and the revert of it) removed right away? > Yes, probably the best way; you can add the Review-by's I've just > sent. > > Dave > Thanks a lot. Will do! Halil