From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix SMMUv3 ACPI integration
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:29:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1e7ca7-e050-1f56-03fb-cafaf2fd6ae5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9B_jLiHLzJZrKuhT3SfXB+pzj03D=NiVNWqRc+zc=qTA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Peter,
On 11/27/18 2:32 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 15:46, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> The AcpiIortSmmu3 misses 2 32b fields corresponding to the
>> proximity domain and the device id mapping index.
>>
>> Also let's report IO-coherent access is supported for
>> translation table walks, descriptor fetches and queues by
>> setting the COHACC override flag. Without that, we observe
>> wrong command opcodes. The DT description also advertises
>> the dma coherency.
>>
>> Fixes a703b4f6c1ee ("hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add smmuv3 node in IORT table")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>> Reported-by: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
>
> Hi; it looks (from looking at the code) like this isn't a
> regression from 3.0 -- is that right?
Correct, the lack of COHACC override flag has been there from the very
beginning.
>
> I think this fix has missed rc3 (discussion seems to be ongoing
> and it needs more time on-list for review), which means it's
> likely to miss the 3.1 release. So at the moment I'm expecting
> it to go into 4.0. (Maybe if we need an rc4 for some other reason
> we might be able to put it in.)
OK
Thanks
Eric
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 15:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix SMMUv3 ACPI integration Eric Auger
2018-11-26 17:04 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-11-26 17:38 ` Auger Eric
2018-11-27 5:53 ` Auger Eric
2018-11-28 16:39 ` Shannon Zhao
2018-11-28 17:26 ` Auger Eric
2018-11-29 2:24 ` Shannon Zhao
2018-11-29 8:42 ` Auger Eric
2018-11-27 13:32 ` Peter Maydell
2018-11-28 17:29 ` Auger Eric [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac1e7ca7-e050-1f56-03fb-cafaf2fd6ae5@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).