From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, darren@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/kvm: add support for MTE
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:06:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac524a4c-f025-4e8a-bfc8-e32ab85d2de4@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5e18524-df95-4cc3-a792-88df69ba7c36@os.amperecomputing.com>
On 29-07-2024 04:10 pm, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>
>
> On 29-07-2024 03:44 pm, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>>
>>> [Apologies for the delayed response]
>>>
>>> On 16-07-2024 09:15 pm, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 07:05, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>>>> <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Extend the 'mte' property for the virt machine to cover KVM as
>>>>> well. For KVM, we don't allocate tag memory, but instead enable
>>>>> the capability.
>>>>>
>>>>> If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
>>>>> yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
>>>>> off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is rework of commit
>>>>> b320e21c48ce64853904bea6631c0158cc2ef227
>>>>> which broke TCG since it made the TCG -cpu max
>>>>> report the presence of MTE to the guest even if the board hadn't
>>>>> enabled MTE by wiring up the tag RAM. This meant that if the guest
>>>>> then tried to use MTE QEMU would segfault accessing the
>>>>> non-existent tag RAM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>>>>> <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>> In target/arm/cpu.c:arm_cpu_realizefn() there is this code:
>>>> if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
>>>> /*
>>>> * The architectural range of GM blocksize is 2-6, however
>>>> qemu
>>>> * doesn't support blocksize of 2 (see HELPER(ldgm)).
>>>> */
>>>> if (tcg_enabled()) {
>>>> assert(cpu->gm_blocksize >= 3 && cpu->gm_blocksize <= 6);
>>>> }
>>>> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>> /*
>>>> * If we do not have tag-memory provided by the machine,
>>>> * reduce MTE support to instructions enabled at EL0.
>>>> * This matches Cortex-A710 BROADCASTMTE input being LOW.
>>>> */
>>>> if (cpu->tag_memory == NULL) {
>>>> cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
>>>> FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1,
>>>> MTE, 1);
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>> }
>>>> With this patch, for KVM we will end up going through the
>>>> "squash ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE to 1" codepath, because KVM doesn't
>>>> set cpu->tag_memory and this is still using that as its check.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I looked at this function and it seems we are not entering this
>>> function for KVM boot. I do see -DCONFIG_USER_ONLY added to make
>>> files.
>>>
My bad, please ignore my previous/above comment.
I did not hit this issue since cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu) is
returning zero/false on my ARM64 platform. Then I dumped the register
id_aa64pfr1 at QEMU(qemu-system-aarch64) as well in Linux(vanilla 6.10)
kernel(for ioctl KVM_GET_ONE_REG) and to my surprise, in qemu the value
is 0x21 however the value at kernel is 0x321(expected value).
Root-caused and it is due to, kernel is hiding[1] the MTE bits of
ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 register from user/qemu. Need to send the kernel patch
upstream to revert it, otherwise this check in qemu is dummy.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.11-rc1&id=2ac638fc5724f011f8ba1b425667c5592e1571ce
>>> Also Linux kernel wont detect/enable MTE until unless the
>>> ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE value is 2(b0010) and above.
>>>
>>>> More generally, how does the enabling of the MTE KVM cap
>>>> interact with the ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 value that we read from
>>>> the host in kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features() ? We care that we
>>>> have the right ID register values because we use ID field
>>>> checks to determine whether the vcpu has a feature or not,
>>>> even in the KVM case.
>>>> Since Cornelia first wrote the patch this is based on, we've
>>>> landed gdbstub support for MTE (so gdb can find out which
>>>> addresses in the memory map have tags and read and write
>>>> those tags). So I think the KVM MTE support now also needs to
>>>> handle that. (See aarch64_cpu_register_gdb_commands() in
>>>> target/arm/gdbstub64.c.)
>>>
>>> Ok sure, I will go through this file to add/update MTE part
>>
>> So to be clear the current MTE gdbstub support is linux-user only.
>> Gustavo has a series on the list that adds the system emulation part:
>>
>> Message-Id: <20240722160709.1677430-1-gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
>> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:07:05 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/4] gdbstub: Add support for MTE in system mode
>> From: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.romero@linaro.org>
>>
>> which of course is focused on TCG. But if the KVM guests sync to the same
>> registers to cpregs I think most stuff should just work. However the
>> current code uses the TCG only:
>>
>> allocation_tag_mem_probe
>>
>> which I guess needs a KVM equivalent to query the tag memory?
>
> Ok, thanks for the heads-up!.
>
Thanks,
Ganapat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-09 6:04 [PATCH] arm/kvm: add support for MTE Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-10 15:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2024-07-11 8:53 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-15 11:27 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-16 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
2024-07-29 9:37 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-29 10:14 ` Alex Bennée
2024-07-29 10:40 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-07-31 12:36 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni [this message]
2024-08-02 12:34 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-08-02 13:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2024-09-10 11:57 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-09-10 12:23 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-11 6:50 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2024-09-11 10:30 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac524a4c-f025-4e8a-bfc8-e32ab85d2de4@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).