From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
devel@lists.libvirt.org,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Peter Krempa" <pkrempa@redhat.com>,
"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests: add testing of parameter=1 for SMP topology
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 10:57:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac639098-2eea-4eb1-bd63-3e377c7ccd61@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513123358.612355-3-berrange@redhat.com>
On 5/13/2024 8:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Validate that it is possible to pass 'parameter=1' for any SMP topology
> parameter, since unsupported parameters are implicitly considered to
> always have a value of 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> index 56165e6644..56ce5128f1 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_valid[] = {
> .config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 8, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 16),
> .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
> .expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
> + }, {
> + /*
> + * Unsupported parameters are always allowed to be set to '1'
> + * config: -smp 8,books=1,drawers=1,sockets=2,modules=1,dies=1,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=8
cores=2 not 4.
> + * expect: cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=8 */
> + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_FULL_TOPO(8, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 8),
> + .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
> + .expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
> },
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-16 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-13 12:33 [PATCH 0/2] hw/core: revert deprecation of 'parameter=1' for SMP topology Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-13 12:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw/core: allow parameter=1 for SMP topology on any machine Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-13 14:22 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-13 14:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-14 3:49 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-15 17:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-16 8:47 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-16 8:54 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-13 12:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] tests: add testing of parameter=1 for SMP topology Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-05-16 2:57 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2024-05-16 8:59 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw/core: revert deprecation of 'parameter=1' " Ján Tomko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac639098-2eea-4eb1-bd63-3e377c7ccd61@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).