From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:04:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac8bf10f-0af9-5116-68ab-492f9d1397a3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <184be580-113d-6661-f88e-84846615b2a1@redhat.com>
On 10/14/21 09:16, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/09/2021 15.50, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> We use new objects to have a dynamic administration of the CPU topology.
>> The highest level object in this implementation is the s390 book and
>> in this first implementation of CPU topology for S390 we have a single
>> book.
>> The book is built as a SYSBUS bridge during the CPU initialization.
>>
>> Every object under this single book will be build dynamically
>> immediately after a CPU has be realized if it is needed.
>> The CPU will fill the sockets once after the other, according to the
>> number of core per socket defined during the smp parsing.
>>
>> Each CPU inside a socket will be represented by a bit in a 64bit
>> unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 353 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> hw/s390x/meson.build | 1 +
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 4 +
>> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 67 ++++++
>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 47 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 472 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..f0ffd86a4f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
>> +/*
>> + * CPU Topology
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp.
>> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>> +
>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
>> (at
>> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
>> + * directory.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qapi/error.h"
>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>> +#include "hw/boards.h"
>> +#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
>> +#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
>> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
>> +
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_create_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket,
>> + int origin)
>> +{
>> + DeviceState *dev;
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> +
>> + if (socket->bus->num_children >= ms->smp.cores) {
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES);
>> + qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, socket->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> + cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(dev);
>> + cores->origin = origin;
>> + socket->cnt += 1;
>> +
>> + return cores;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_create_socket(S390TopologyBook *book,
>> int id)
>> +{
>> + DeviceState *dev;
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> +
>> + if (book->bus->num_children >= ms->smp.sockets) {
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET);
>> + qdev_realize_and_unref(dev, book->bus, &error_fatal);
>> +
>> + socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(dev);
>> + socket->socket_id = id;
>> + book->cnt++;
>> +
>> + return socket;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_cores:
>> + * @socket: the socket to search into
>> + * @origin: the origin specified for the S390TopologyCores
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologyCores structure within a socket
>> having
>> + * the specified origin.
>> + * First search if the socket is already containing the
>> S390TopologyCores
>> + * structure and if not create one with this origin.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologyCores *s390_get_cores(S390TopologySocket *socket,
>> int origin)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &socket->bus->children, sibling) {
>> + cores = S390_TOPOLOGY_CORES(kid->child);
>> + if (cores->origin == origin) {
>> + return cores;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return s390_create_cores(socket, origin);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_get_socket:
>> + * @book: The book to search into
>> + * @socket_id: the identifier of the socket to search for
>> + *
>> + * returns a pointer to a S390TopologySocket structure within a book
>> having
>> + * the specified socket_id.
>> + * First search if the book is already containing the S390TopologySocket
>> + * structure and if not create one with this socket_id.
>> + */
>> +static S390TopologySocket *s390_get_socket(S390TopologyBook *book,
>> + int socket_id)
>> +{
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + BusChild *kid;
>> +
>> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &book->bus->children, sibling) {
>> + socket = S390_TOPOLOGY_SOCKET(kid->child);
>> + if (socket->socket_id == socket_id) {
>> + return socket;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return s390_create_socket(book, socket_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * s390_topology_new_cpu:
>> + * @core_id: the core ID is machine wide
>> + *
>> + * We have a single book returned by s390_get_topology(),
>> + * then we build the hierarchy on demand.
>> + * Note that we do not destroy the hierarchy on error creating
>> + * an entry in the topology, we just keep it empty.
>> + * We do not need to worry about not finding a topology level
>> + * entry this would have been caught during smp parsing.
>> + */
>> +void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id)
>> +{
>> + const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> + S390TopologyBook *book;
>> + S390TopologySocket *socket;
>> + S390TopologyCores *cores;
>> + int cores_per_socket, sock_idx;
>> + int origin, bit;
>> +
>> + book = s390_get_topology();
>> +
>> + cores_per_socket = ms->smp.max_cpus / ms->smp.sockets;
>> +
>> + sock_idx = (core_id / cores_per_socket);
>> + socket = s390_get_socket(book, sock_idx);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We assume that all CPU are identical IFL, shared and
>> + * horizontal topology, the only reason to have several
>> + * S390TopologyCores is to have more than 64 CPUs.
>> + */
>> + origin = 64 * (core_id / 64);
>> +
>> + cores = s390_get_cores(socket, origin);
>> +
>> + bit = 63 - (core_id - origin);
>> + set_bit(bit, &cores->mask);
>> + cores->origin = origin;
>> +}
>
> Are these "64" an artificial limit by the hardware? Or is it just an
> implementation detail in your code since you chose to use a uint64_t
> variable for the mask? In the latter case, why not use a bitfield? ...
> anyway, could you please add some more comments to the code why you are
> using "64" here? (e.g. the sentences "Each CPU inside a socket will be
> represented by a bit in a 64bit
> unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU." should go
> into the cpu-topology.c file, too).
>
> Thomas
>
The 64 bit is designed by hardware.
I will had more comments describing how the core topology entry is
designed and used by hardware.
Thanks for your comments
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 13:50 [PATCH v3 0/4] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2021-09-16 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] linux-headers update Pierre Morel
2021-09-16 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: kvm: topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2021-10-13 7:25 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-13 7:55 ` Pierre Morel
2021-10-13 9:11 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-14 8:09 ` Pierre Morel
2021-10-21 8:44 ` Pierre Morel
2021-11-17 13:06 ` Pierre Morel
2021-09-16 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures Pierre Morel
2021-10-14 7:16 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-14 12:04 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2021-09-16 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System Information Pierre Morel
2021-10-13 8:20 ` Thomas Huth
2021-10-13 8:40 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac8bf10f-0af9-5116-68ab-492f9d1397a3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).