From: "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Laurent Vivier" <laurent@vivier.eu>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] qemu-options: Add missing "sockets=2" to CLI "-smp 2"
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 19:42:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acac6e0a-c91f-af9b-fd11-2f078de79c91@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVL2JDoQ2XNvmo+H@redhat.com>
On 2021/9/28 19:01, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 06:58:20PM +0800, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
>> On 2021/9/28 18:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 9/28/21 11:31, Yanan Wang wrote:
>>>> There is one example of -smp CLI in qemu-options.hx currently
>>>> using "-smp 2" and assuming that there will be 2 sockets.
>>>> However now the actually calculation logic of missing sockets
>>>> and cores is not immutable, we should use more explicit CLIs
>>>> like "-smp 2,sockets=2" if we want multiple sockets.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>>>> index dcd9595650..ff8917c5e1 100644
>>>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>>>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>>>> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ SRST
>>>> -m 2G \
>>>> -object memory-backend-ram,size=1G,id=m0 \
>>>> -object memory-backend-ram,size=1G,id=m1 \
>>>> - -smp 2 \
>>>> + -smp 2,sockets=2,maxcpus=2 \
>>> Is the addition of "maxcpus=2" intentional?
>> Yes, but it's not necessary IMO. I just wanted to keep consistency
>> with other numa config examples in the Doc. Should I remove it ?
> I think it makes sense to be explicit, because the numa config
> works in terms of maxcpus when splitting cpus between nodes
The statement of this numa config example actually assume that
there will be 2 cpus totally. Although based on behavior of the
smp parser we will get maxcpus=2, I also tend to keep it explicitly.
But I should update subject of this patch and the commit message.
Thanks,
Yanan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 9:31 [PATCH 0/2] qemu-options: Trivial doc fixes related to -smp Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] qemu-options: Tweak [, maxcpus=cpus] to [, maxcpus=maxcpus] Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:40 ` Damien Hedde
2021-09-28 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] qemu-options: Add missing "sockets=2" to CLI "-smp 2" Yanan Wang
2021-09-28 10:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-09-28 10:58 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-09-28 11:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-09-28 11:42 ` wangyanan (Y) [this message]
2021-09-28 11:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acac6e0a-c91f-af9b-fd11-2f078de79c91@huawei.com \
--to=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).