From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put: skip the registers banked by GICR
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:04:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acca5b80-f527-bc39-0b63-147e53affb4b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527047633-12368-2-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Hi Shannon,
On 05/23/2018 05:53 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> While we skip the GIC_INTERNAL irqs, we don't change the register offset
> accordingly. This will overlap the GICR registers value and leave the
> last GIC_INTERNAL irq's registers out of update.
>
> Fix this by skipping the registers banked by GICR.
>
> Also for migration compatibility if the migration source (old version
> qemu) doesn't send gicd_no_shift_bug = 1 to destination, then we shift
> the data of PPI to get the right data for SPI.
>
> Fixes: 367b9f527becdd20ddf116e17a3c0c2bbc486920
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes in V3: add migration compatibility and fix code style
> ---
> hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> index 7b54d52..f93e5d2 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,38 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
> }
> };
>
> +static int gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_pre_load(void *opaque)
> +{
> + GICv3State *cs = opaque;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the gicd_no_shift_bug subsection is not transferred this
> + * means gicd_no_shift_bug is 0x0 (which might not be the same as
> + * our reset value).
> + */
> + cs->gicd_no_shift_bug = 0x0;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_needed(void *opaque)
> +{
> + GICv3State *cs = opaque;
> +
> + return cs->gicd_no_shift_bug;
> +}
> +
> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug = {
> + .name = "arm_gicv3/gicd_no_shift_bug",
> + .version_id = 1,
> + .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .pre_load = gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_pre_load,
> + .needed = gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug_needed,
> + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_BOOL(gicd_no_shift_bug, GICv3State),
> + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> + }
> +};
> +
> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
> .name = "arm_gicv3",
> .version_id = 1,
> @@ -165,6 +197,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
> VMSTATE_STRUCT_VARRAY_POINTER_UINT32(cpu, GICv3State, num_cpu,
> vmstate_gicv3_cpu, GICv3CPUState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> + },
> + .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * []) {
> + &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_shift_bug,
> + NULL
> }
> };
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> index 3536795..bd961f1 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_kvm.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
> int irq;
>
> field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> + * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
> + * sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
Now I am unclear about the semantics of the s->gicd_ipriority & friends.
With that change, is it supposed to contain only the states of SPIs or
contain the RAZ states of PPI/SGIs + states of SPIs. The array is
dimensionned to contain states for PPI/SGI+SPIs, right? In other words,
shouldn't we also shift field?
Thanks
Eric
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> *field = reg;
> @@ -149,7 +155,18 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_priority(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint8_t *bmp)
> uint32_t reg, *field;
> int irq;
>
> - field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> + if (!s->gicd_no_shift_bug) {
> + field = (uint32_t *)(bmp + 8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + } else {
> + field = (uint32_t *)bmp;
> + }
> +
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 8
> + * GICD_IPRIORITYR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_IPRIORITYR<n>. So it doesn't need to
> + * sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (8 * sizeof(uint32_t));
in the old to new migration scenario, IIUC,
bmp contains state of 32 internal PPI/SGI(RAZ) + s->num_irq-32 SPIs
Here aren't you "putting" the RAZ state of the 32 PPI/SGIs into the
first 32 SPIs here?
Thanks
Eric
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 8) {
> reg = *field;
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, true);
> @@ -164,6 +181,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_get_edge_trigger(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 2
> + * GICD_ICFGR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_ICFGR<n>. So it doesn't need to sync
> + * them.
> + */
> + offset += (2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 2) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> reg = half_unshuffle32(reg >> 1);
> @@ -181,6 +204,16 @@ static void kvm_dist_put_edge_trigger(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + if (!s->gicd_no_shift_bug) {
> + bmp += (2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + }
> +
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the first 2
> + * GICD_ICFGR<n> registers are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding
> + * functionality is replaced by GICR_ICFGR<n>. So it doesn't need to sync
> + * them.
> + */
> + offset += (2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 2) {
> reg = *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq);
> if (irq % 32 != 0) {
> @@ -222,6 +255,12 @@ static void kvm_dist_getbmp(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t *bmp)
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the
> + * GICD_IGROUPR0/GICD_ISENABLER0/GICD_ISPENDR0/GICD_ISACTIVER0 registers
> + * are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding functionality is replaced by the
> + * GICR registers. So it doesn't need to sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 1) {
> kvm_gicd_access(s, offset, ®, false);
> *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq) = reg;
> @@ -235,6 +274,20 @@ static void kvm_dist_putbmp(GICv3State *s, uint32_t offset,
> uint32_t reg;
> int irq;
>
> + if (!s->gicd_no_shift_bug) {
> + bmp += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + }
> +
> + /* For the KVM GICv3, affinity routing is always enabled, and the
> + * GICD_IGROUPR0/GICD_ISENABLER0/GICD_ISPENDR0/GICD_ISACTIVER0 registers
> + * are always RAZ/WI. The corresponding functionality is replaced by the
> + * GICR registers. So it doesn't need to sync them.
> + */
> + offset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + if (clroffset != 0) {
> + clroffset += (1 * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + }
> +
> for_each_dist_irq_reg(irq, s->num_irq, 1) {
> /* If this bitmap is a set/clear register pair, first write to the
> * clear-reg to clear all bits before using the set-reg to write
> @@ -651,6 +704,7 @@ static void kvm_arm_gicv3_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> + s->gicd_no_shift_bug = 1;
> kvm_arm_gicv3_put(s);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> index bccdfe1..13c28c0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ struct GICv3State {
> uint32_t revision;
> bool security_extn;
> bool irq_reset_nonsecure;
> + bool gicd_no_shift_bug;
>
> int dev_fd; /* kvm device fd if backed by kvm vgic support */
> Error *migration_blocker;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-23 3:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: increase clroffset accordingly Shannon Zhao
2018-05-23 3:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: kvm_dist_get/put: skip the registers banked by GICR Shannon Zhao
2018-05-24 9:04 ` Auger Eric [this message]
2018-05-24 9:20 ` Shannon Zhao
2018-05-24 12:10 ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 13:14 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 13:59 ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 14:16 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 14:40 ` Auger Eric
2018-05-24 14:56 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 14:58 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 15:09 ` Auger Eric
2018-05-25 8:42 ` Shannon Zhao
2018-05-25 9:00 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-24 13:11 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-25 9:15 ` Shannon Zhao
2018-05-24 12:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/2] arm_gicv3_kvm: increase clroffset accordingly Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acca5b80-f527-bc39-0b63-147e53affb4b@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).