qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] gitlab: build all container images during CI
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:25:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acfb1a3a-e18d-dc4e-e28a-35201bafad86@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625102457.GG1009994@redhat.com>

On 25/06/2020 12.24, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 12:14:33PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 22/06/2020 17.33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> We have a number of container images in tests/docker/dockerfiles
>>> that are intended to provide well defined environments for doing
>>> test builds. We want our CI system to use these containers too.
>>>
>>> This introduces builds of all of them as the first stage in the
>>> CI, so that the built containers are available for later build
>>> jobs. The containers are setup to use the GitLab container
>>> registry as the cache, so we only pay the penalty of the full
>>> build when the dockerfiles change. The main qemu-project/qemu
>>> repo is used as a second cache, so that users forking QEMU will
>>> see a fast turnaround time on their CI jobs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml | 248 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    .gitlab-ci.yml              |   3 +
>>>    2 files changed, 251 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100644 .gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..ea1edbb196
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +.container_job_template: &container_job_definition
>>> +  image: docker:stable
>>> +  stage: containers
>>> +  services:
>>> +    - docker:dind
>>> +  before_script:
>>> +    - export TAG="$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE/ci-$NAME:latest"
>>> +    - export COMMON_TAG="$CI_REGISTRY/qemu-project/qemu/ci-$NAME:latest"
>>> +    - docker info
>>> +    - docker login registry.gitlab.com -u "$CI_REGISTRY_USER" -p "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD"
>>> +  script:
>>> +    - docker pull "$TAG" || docker pull "$COMMON_TAG" || true
>>> +    - sed -i -e "s,FROM qemu:,FROM $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE/ci-," tests/docker/dockerfiles/$NAME.docker
>>> +    - docker build --cache-from "$TAG" --cache-from "$COMMON_TAG" --tag "$TAG" -f "tests/docker/dockerfiles/$NAME.docker" tests/docker/dockerfiles
>>> +    - docker push "$TAG"
>>> +  after_script:
>>> +    - docker logout
>>
>> .gitlab-ci.d/edk2.yml uses a "changes" rule to only run the pipeline if
>> something really has been changed. Could you use something similar here?
>> E.g.:
>>
>> rules:
>>   - changes:
>>     - .gitlab-ci.d/containers.yml
>>     - tests/docker/*
>>     - tests/docker/dockerfiles/*
>>
>> ?
> 
> If the OS distro base image changes, we'll never pick it up with that
> kind of filtering.  For the main gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu  you
> could configure a nightly/weekly/whatever job to force rebuild on a
> periodic basis to pick up base image changes.  The downside of this
> is that any users who fork qemu won't have that periodic job and so
> will be testing their work against potentially outdated content.
> 
> Having said all that, I'm not 100% convinced I'm actually picking
> up changed base images right now anyway, given our use of caching.
> 
> It is possible that I would need todo an explict "docker pull" of
> the base image to force it to trigger a refresh othrewise I have
> a feeling we're always cached.

But currently, each of the container stages currently takes > 2 minutes, 
even with the cached containers. I had a quick look, and it takes 7 
minutes 'till the "build" stage begins. So all the advantages of not 
having to do "yum/apt-get install" in the build containers anymore seem 
to be crushed by the time that the three container stages take now?

  Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-25 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22 15:33 [PATCH RFC 0/3] gitlab: build containers to use in build jobs Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-22 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] gitlab: introduce explicit "container" and "build" stages Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-22 15:59   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-25  8:54   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25  8:58     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-22 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] gitlab: build all container images during CI Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-22 15:38   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-22 15:46     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-22 16:13       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-06-22 18:26   ` Alex Bennée
2020-06-23  8:47     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-23  9:35       ` Alex Bennée
2020-06-25  9:35   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25  9:50     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 15:57       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-25 10:07   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 11:14     ` Alex Bennée
2020-06-25 10:14   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25 10:24     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 13:25       ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-06-25 14:29         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-22 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] gitlab: convert jobs to use custom built containers Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25  9:59   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25 10:31 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] gitlab: build containers to use in build jobs Alex Bennée
2020-06-25 11:15 ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25 11:26   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 11:29     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-06-25 11:33       ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-25 11:39         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acfb1a3a-e18d-dc4e-e28a-35201bafad86@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).