From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
mst@redhat.com, aconole@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, fbl@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
mlureau@redhat.com, ktraynor@redhat.com
Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 0/3] virtio-net: Add support to MTU feature
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:16:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad8c2014-1bba-4042-29ed-919bc12a54d6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4b08db5-6638-942f-4b0f-8aa3f093cb58@redhat.com>
On 11/30/2016 12:23 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年11月30日 18:10, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> This series implements Virtio spec update from Aaron Conole which
>> defines a way for the host to expose its max MTU to the guest.
>>
>> This third version re-desings how MTU value is provided to QEMU.
>> Now, host_mtu parameter is added to provide QEMU with the MTU value,
>> and the backend, if supported, gets notified of the MTU value when the
>> MTU feature neogotiation succeeds.
>>
>> Only user backend currently supports MTU notification. A new protocol
>> feature has been implemented for sending MTU value to the backend.
>> Aaron, Kevin, Flavio, do you confirm this works for OVS if DPDK vhost lib
>> adds needed API to get the MTU value?
>>
>> For kernel backend, it is expected the management tool also configures
>> the tap/macvtap interface with same MTU value.
>> Daniel, I would be interrested about your feedback on this implementation
>> from management tool point of view.
>
> I believe we want management tool to configure both kernel and user
> backends.
Yes, I think you are right.
The vhost-user protocol feature would in this case be used to ensure
consistency.
Does that make sense, or we should just drop VHOST_USER_SET_MTU?
Thanks,
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 10:10 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 0/3] virtio-net: Add support to MTU feature Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 1/3] vhost-user: Add MTU protocol feature and op Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 10:25 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-11-30 12:17 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 2/3] vhost-net: Notify the backend about the host MTU Maxime Coquelin
2016-12-06 18:31 ` Aaron Conole
2016-12-07 7:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 3/3] virtio-net: Add MTU feature support Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 11:24 ` Jason Wang
2016-11-30 12:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-11-30 10:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 0/3] virtio-net: Add support to MTU feature no-reply
2016-11-30 11:23 ` Jason Wang
2016-11-30 12:16 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2016-11-30 13:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-05 16:11 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad8c2014-1bba-4042-29ed-919bc12a54d6@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=mlureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).