From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae1eb296-2737-4871-8769-cee78e459bca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871q1qurol.fsf@redhat.com>
On 11.09.24 17:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather have it in a shared and bigger repo than in your personal
>>>> gitlab one. Maybe there's a space somewhere in QEMU or the Virtio team's
>>>> repos that would be a good fit if the kernel's docu isn't the right place?
>>>
>>> At this point, outside of kernel/QEMU feels like the right thing to do.
>>> Conny is already a co-maintainer of my "personal" (;)) gitlab.
>>>
>>>
>>> And now I realize that I CCed Heiko on the Linux series but not the QEMU
>>> series. My bad.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200727114819.3f816010.cohuck@redhat.com/
>>
>>
>> No prob. Or if you want it in virtio spec, that's also fine.
>
> The virtio spec makes sense for documenting things needed to implement
> it, but what I liked about the gitlab project is that it tries to go
> into more s390-specific aspects (that feel a bit out of scope for the
> virtio spec), and that it provides a place to document non-virtio
> related interfaces.
>
> Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make
> sense to create an org for it, so that it doesn't look like David's
> personal project?
I had that in mind as well, I can move the project.
> In any case, while I'm happy to stay on, I'm not that
> involved with s390 anymore, and it might make sense to add more people
> to it.
Indeed!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 17:57 [PATCH v1 00/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: don't crash on weird RAM sizes David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:28 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 12:46 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-11 12:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 20:28 ` Eric Farman
2024-09-23 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-23 15:36 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-23 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: remove hypercall registration mechanism David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 16:02 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] s390x/s390-virtio-hcall: prepare for more diag500 hypercalls David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:04 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 13:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 10:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-10 17:57 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] s390x: rename s390-virtio-hcall* to s390-hypercall* David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 17:05 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: move setting the maximum guest size from sclp to machine code David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:07 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:10 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-16 13:20 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-17 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-17 12:48 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-23 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] s390x/s390-hypercall: introduce DIAG500 STORAGE_LIMIT David Hildenbrand
2024-09-12 8:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-09-12 10:54 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-27 18:05 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 12:57 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 9:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-10-01 13:31 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 14:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm: prepare memory devices and sparse memory layouts David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] s390x/s390-skeys: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] s390x/pv: check initial, not maximum RAM size David Hildenbrand
2024-09-24 16:22 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-24 20:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 9:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 11:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-09-30 11:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-30 13:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 13:26 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: prepare for memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_max_pagesize() David Hildenbrand
2024-09-26 10:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] s390x/virtio-ccw: add support for virtio based memory devices David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 17:58 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] s390x: virtio-mem support David Hildenbrand
2024-09-10 18:33 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-10 18:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 11:49 ` Janosch Frank
2024-09-11 12:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-11 14:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-09-11 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2024-09-11 19:09 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-09-27 18:20 ` Halil Pasic
2024-09-27 18:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-30 21:49 ` Halil Pasic
2024-10-01 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-02 9:04 ` Janosch Frank
2024-10-07 12:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae1eb296-2737-4871-8769-cee78e459bca@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).