From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmxj-00051H-Dr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:21:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmxg-0000bk-7v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:21:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eBmxf-0000bL-Uz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:21:32 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C842C5F152 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:21:30 +0000 (UTC) References: <20171106185411.19551-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 13:21:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171106185411.19551-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BWpN00LnDIURmO3sesA06hb3FfA4QFQxc" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] .gitignore: remove vscclient List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --BWpN00LnDIURmO3sesA06hb3FfA4QFQxc From: Eric Blake To: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] .gitignore: remove vscclient References: <20171106185411.19551-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171106185411.19551-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2017 12:54 PM, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > It was removed with libcacard. which was back in which commit? I'm trying to get an idea of how long this entry has been stale. I'm not opposed to this patch, but I personally like to leave .gitignore entries in place for several releases after they are last useful, to make incremental builds easier when jumping around between old and new branches across the point where the file was removed (as long as the new branch still ignores the file, then building the file in the old branch doesn't hurt the new branch). Of course, if I'm that involved in backporting madness across branches, I'm also fine updating my own =2Egit/info/exclude for cruft that is built in only one of two branches, rather than relying on per-branch .gitignore to do it for me. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org --BWpN00LnDIURmO3sesA06hb3FfA4QFQxc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEccLMIrHEYCkn0vOqp6FrSiUnQ2oFAloAtjcACgkQp6FrSiUn Q2pJqwgAlQHwC9qyCWRKyRhZYeQizAByGndtoHQ8PbV8In5Ptfgwc9a9Kz+ZjGoI wFGF7HwwxJxIZqryVkCX19AjYXSVw9NY9X/xcJCFxqBokzDRTIBycXfcB9j1vXIw 97hPeMjJ/au7ET9hh/XTcWO9MuMeqPN4i+f/t5xW60OFFsARzUMQRgG1HW1HDgJL YMYW6sS8G4bICXenkvhzdm/LbUcc/wtcejeQwi5v0TC2G3ZFFim+Wt4zMqhuEgGC ElTSeXXAAvMCF9np28xVIdco64oSbstyow4+qkX1JgCn9XrjLajhKjEiX6+ics6D G7JyjQWJLY4UyPIG/FAO8Aax9Pn9ag== =nRC9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BWpN00LnDIURmO3sesA06hb3FfA4QFQxc--