From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 (for 2.10) 0/1] Document deprecation policy & features
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:30:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae98f8b1-1d49-ced9-200b-4fb9406ebfdf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725112656.30122-1-berrange@redhat.com>
On 25/07/2017 13:26, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This is a followup to
>
> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-05/msg02390.html
> v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-06/msg01286.html
> v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg00651.html
> v4: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg04239.html
>
> I would really strongly like to see this documented in time for the
> 2.10 release, so that we can start the clock ticking on our deprecation
> policy and thus actually delete some stuff in the not too distant
> future.
>
> The goal is to clarify to users & app developers what they can expect
> from QEMU in terms of feature life & any deprecation policy should
> it be neccessary to remove features.
>
> The list of features marked as deprecated was determined by looking at
> the QEMU source for the word "deprecated'. It was then compared with
> the doc Thomas put up at http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LegacyRemoval
>
> Key differences with the wiki page that Thomas wrote up vs patch 2
> in this series
>
> - Deprecated features are given a fixed lifespan of 2 releases,
> rather than listing deletion at a future "major" v3.0.0 release.
> This ensures that applications like libvirt have a predictable
> fixed amount of time to react to deprecations.
>
> - Only lists features which are currently officially deprecated,
> no list of possible future candidates. The wiki page is probably
> a good place to maintain a list of future possible deprecations.
> To turn them into actual deprecations, a patch to the QEMU doc
> can then be posted & reviewed in the normal manner.
>
> - Not listing the '-6' and '-e' args to qemu-img create. Those
> were never deprecations, because the functionality was
> immediately turned into a fatal error. Patches to delete these
> have been merged now
>
> Changed in v6:
>
> - Remove all discussion of machine types lifecycle since it
> looks like they will be better kept upstream for as long
> as any downstream wants them (Paolo)
>
> - Get rid of separate "Support lifecycle" appendix and fold
> its content into the "Deprecated features" appendix (Daniel)
>
> - Fix s/-monitor/-mon/ (Thomas)
>
> Changed in v5:
>
> - Removed misleading reference to "major" release (Eduardo)
>
> Changed in v4:
>
> - Misc typos / wording clarification (Thomas)
>
> Changed in v3:
>
> - Rename appendix to "Deprecated features" (Markus)
> - List all currently deprecated features
> - Document that deprecated features will be removed after
> 2 releases of being deprecated
> - Clarify that clock for removing historically deprecated
> features starts with the forthcoming release.
>
> Changed in v2:
>
> - Split into 2 patches so we can consider each suggested addition
> independantly.
>
>
> Daniel P. Berrange (1):
> docs: document deprecation policy & deprecated features in appendix
>
> qemu-doc.texi | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
>
Queued for 2.10, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-25 11:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 (for 2.10) 0/1] Document deprecation policy & features Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-25 11:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 (for 2.10) 1/1] docs: document deprecation policy & deprecated features in appendix Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-25 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-25 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 (for 2.10) 0/1] Document deprecation policy & features Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-07-25 13:30 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae98f8b1-1d49-ced9-200b-4fb9406ebfdf@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).