From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CmBeW-0000pF-EH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:56:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CmBeU-0000oU-JD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:56:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CmBeU-0000oE-7G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:56:42 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.201] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmBJe-0008Ou-UR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:35:11 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so362153wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:35:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:35:09 +0100 From: Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm dynamically linked binary problem In-Reply-To: <20041231182126.GA29948@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041231182126.GA29948@xi.wantstofly.org> Reply-To: Magnus Damm , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:21:26 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Hi, > > I have three sets of {ld-linux,libc} for little-endian ARM: one from > qemu-gnemul-0.5.1.tar.gz from the qemu site, one hand-built with gcc > 3.3.4 and glibc 2.3.3, and one hand-built with gcc 3.4.2 and glibc > 2.3.3. Yours works and mine don't. > > Is there anything special about your libraries? Which versions of > gcc/glibc did you use to build them? I have not much experience with ARM, but have you tried to use a toolchain built with crosstool? Maybe there are some patches there? I also grepped for arm in the glibc directory of my portage tree and it looks like there are some arm-specific patches there too. / magnus