From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CpvdD-0004Q7-HV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:38:51 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CpvdB-0004PT-SH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:38:49 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CpvdB-0004PQ-9k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:38:49 -0500
Received: from [64.233.184.206] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CpvR0-0003x6-AA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:26:14 -0500
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so995617wri
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <aec7e5c3050115132653a2766f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:26:13 +0100
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] parallel and -nographic
In-Reply-To: <41E97B1F.3090506@bellard.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20050115192223.7875.51285.68676@kubu>
	<41E97B1F.3090506@bellard.org>
Reply-To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hello,

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:20:47 +0100, Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org> wrote:
> I think the bug comes from the fact that the parallel port is redirected
> to stdio in -nographic mode. I see no reason to do that.

Neither do I. But I was not sure - therefore the workaroundish patch.. =)

/ magnus