From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxmrB-0006t6-C7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:53:45 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxmr5-0006pd-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:53:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cxmr2-0006kh-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:53:36 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.204] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxmXK-0005k7-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:33:14 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so465392wri for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 05:33:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:33:05 +0100 From: Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack In-Reply-To: <420613B7.2070202@enix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <420613B7.2070202@enix.org> Reply-To: Magnus Damm , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:55:19 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that > this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with this ? Give it up? No. I would like to do some bios hacking in the future and I therefore welcome this feature. / magnus