* [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack @ 2005-02-06 12:55 Thomas Petazzoni 2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2005-02-06 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --] Hello, I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with this ? Thanks, Thomas -- PETAZZONI Thomas - thomas.petazzoni@enix.org http://thomas.enix.org - Jabber: thomas.petazzoni@jabber.dk KOS: http://kos.enix.org/ - SOS: http://sos.enix.org Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E 1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7 [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack 2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni @ 2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Magnus Damm @ 2005-02-06 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:55:19 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@enix.org> wrote: > I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that > this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with this ? Give it up? No. I would like to do some bios hacking in the future and I therefore welcome this feature. / magnus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack 2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni 2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm @ 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard 2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Fabrice Bellard @ 2005-02-06 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel > I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that > this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with > this ? Don't worry, it will be merged someday. Just a question : why did you code it as if there were several port E9 devices ? Fabrice. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard @ 2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2005-02-06 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --] Hello, Fabrice Bellard a écrit : > Don't worry, it will be merged someday. Just a question : why did you > code it as if there were several port E9 devices ? Just because I code it like serial and parallel port. I wasn't sure of how you wanted it to be coded. I can modify the patch to correct this, if needed. Thomas -- PETAZZONI Thomas - thomas.petazzoni@enix.org http://thomas.enix.org - Jabber: thomas.petazzoni@jabber.dk KOS: http://kos.enix.org/ - SOS: http://sos.enix.org Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E 1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7 [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-06 15:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni 2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard 2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).