From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzufS-00084m-Eq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:38:27 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzufQ-00082y-G1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:38:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzufN-0007zI-LK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:38:22 -0500 Received: from [64.233.184.196] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzuR1-0000ta-FK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:23:31 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so423181wri for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:23:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:23:31 +0100 From: Magnus Damm Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] release candidates Reply-To: Magnus Damm , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, Every new release of QEMU includes several new features. Bugs are fixed. Some bugs are introduced. I would like to see release candidates as part of the release procedure. This together with the community focusing on testing would lead to less bugs and a better user experience IMHO. Thanks. / magnus