From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] target/s390x: Factor diag_iplb_read() out
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:57:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aed7caad-b980-4040-a8af-e508df8e27be@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002091132.65703-3-philmd@linaro.org>
On 02/10/2025 11.11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
This patch is also missing a proper reasoning in the patch description.
Thomas
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/s390x/diag.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index ed320fc0c1f..c2fedc55213 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,24 @@ static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool diag_iplb_read(IplParameterBlock *iplb, S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr)
> +{
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> + if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + } else {
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> + if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void diag_iplb_write(IplParameterBlock *iplb, S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr)
> {
> const size_t iplb_len = be32_to_cpu(iplb->len);
> @@ -125,23 +143,12 @@ void handle_diag_308(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
> return;
> }
> iplb = g_new0(IplParameterBlock, 1);
> - if (!s390_is_pv()) {
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> - } else {
> - s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, sizeof(iplb->len));
> - }
>
> - if (!iplb_valid_len(iplb)) {
> + if (!diag_iplb_read(iplb, cpu, addr)) {
> env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_308_RC_INVALID;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!s390_is_pv()) {
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> - } else {
> - s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, 0, iplb, be32_to_cpu(iplb->len));
> - }
> -
> valid = subcode == DIAG308_PV_SET ? iplb_valid_pv(iplb) : iplb_valid(iplb);
> if (!valid) {
> if (subcode == DIAG308_SET && iplb->pbt == S390_IPL_TYPE_QEMU_SCSI) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-06 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 9:11 [PATCH 0/9] target/s390x: Remove legacy cpu_physical_memory_*() calls Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] target/s390x: Factor diag_iplb_write() out Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 13:55 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 2/9] target/s390x: Factor diag_iplb_read() out Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 13:57 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 3/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_read/write() calls Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:04 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-06 14:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (1/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 5/9] target/s390x: Propagate CPUS390XState to cpu_unmap_lowcore() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:08 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 6/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (2/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:09 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 7/9] target/s390x: Reduce s390_store_adtl_status() scope Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:11 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 8/9] target/s390x: Reduce s390_store_status() scope Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-10-06 14:16 ` Thomas Huth
2025-10-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 9/9] target/s390x: Replace legacy cpu_physical_memory_[un]map() calls (3/3) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aed7caad-b980-4040-a8af-e508df8e27be@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).