From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com,
berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 13:40:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aef8accb-3576-2b10-a946-191a6be3e3e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230630091752.67190-4-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On 30/06/2023 11.17, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On interception of STSI(15.1.x) the System Information Block
> (SYSIB) is built from the list of pre-ordered topology entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index 7ebd5e05b6..6e7d041b01 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -569,6 +569,29 @@ typedef struct SysIB_322 {
> } SysIB_322;
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_322) != 4096);
>
> +/*
> + * Topology Magnitude fields (MAG) indicates the maximum number of
> + * topology list entries (TLE) at the corresponding nesting level.
> + */
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG 6
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG6 0
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG5 1
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4 2
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3 3
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2 4
> +#define S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1 5
> +/* Configuration topology */
> +typedef struct SysIB_151x {
> + uint8_t reserved0[2];
> + uint16_t length;
> + uint8_t mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG];
> + uint8_t reserved1;
> + uint8_t mnest;
> + uint32_t reserved2;
> + char tle[];
> +} SysIB_151x;
> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB_151x) != 16);
> +
> typedef union SysIB {
> SysIB_111 sysib_111;
> SysIB_121 sysib_121;
> @@ -576,9 +599,62 @@ typedef union SysIB {
> SysIB_221 sysib_221;
> SysIB_222 sysib_222;
> SysIB_322 sysib_322;
> + SysIB_151x sysib_151x;
> } SysIB;
> QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB) != 4096);
>
> +/*
> + * CPU Topology List provided by STSI with fc=15 provides a list
> + * of two different Topology List Entries (TLE) types to specify
> + * the topology hierarchy.
> + *
> + * - Container Topology List Entry
> + * Defines a container to contain other Topology List Entries
> + * of any type, nested containers or CPU.
> + * - CPU Topology List Entry
> + * Specifies the CPUs position, type, entitlement and polarization
> + * of the CPUs contained in the last Container TLE.
> + *
> + * There can be theoretically up to five levels of containers, QEMU
> + * uses only three levels, the drawer's, book's and socket's level.
> + *
> + * A container with a nesting level (NL) greater than 1 can only
> + * contain another container of nesting level NL-1.
> + *
> + * A container of nesting level 1 (socket), contains as many CPU TLE
> + * as needed to describe the position and qualities of all CPUs inside
> + * the container.
> + * The qualities of a CPU are polarization, entitlement and type.
> + *
> + * The CPU TLE defines the position of the CPUs of identical qualities
> + * using a 64bits mask which first bit has its offset defined by
> + * the CPU address orgin field of the CPU TLE like in:
> + * CPU address = origin * 64 + bit position within the mask
> + *
> + */
> +/* Container type Topology List Entry */
> +typedef struct SysIBTl_container {
> + uint8_t nl;
> + uint8_t reserved[6];
> + uint8_t id;
> +} SysIBTl_container;
Why mixing CamelCase with underscore-style here? SysIBTlContainer would look
more natural, I think?
> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIBTl_container) != 8);
> +
> +/* CPU type Topology List Entry */
> +typedef struct SysIBTl_cpu {
> + uint8_t nl;
> + uint8_t reserved0[3];
> +#define SYSIB_TLE_POLARITY_MASK 0x03
> +#define SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED 0x04
> + uint8_t flags;
> + uint8_t type;
> + uint16_t origin;
> + uint64_t mask;
> +} SysIBTl_cpu;
dito, maybe better SysIBTlCpu ?
> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIBTl_cpu) != 16);
> +
> +void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, uint64_t addr, uint8_t ar);
> +
> /* MMU defines */
> #define ASCE_ORIGIN (~0xfffULL) /* segment table origin */
> #define ASCE_SUBSPACE 0x200 /* subspace group control */
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> index b163c17f8f..ca1634d0ce 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> @@ -29,11 +29,13 @@
> * .cores_per_socket: tracks information on the count of cores
> * per socket.
> * .smp: keeps track of the machine topology.
> - *
> + * .list: queue the topology entries inside which
> + * we keep the information on the CPU topology.
The comment does not match the code below.
> */
> S390Topology s390_topology = {
> /* will be initialized after the cpu model is realized */
> .cores_per_socket = NULL,
> + .polarization = S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_HORIZONTAL,
> };
>
> /**
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> index 3ac7ec9acf..5ea358cbb0 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -1919,9 +1919,12 @@ static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu)
> if (run->s390_stsi.sel1 != 2 || run->s390_stsi.sel2 != 2) {
> return 0;
> }
> - /* Only sysib 3.2.2 needs post-handling for now. */
> insert_stsi_3_2_2(cpu, run->s390_stsi.addr, run->s390_stsi.ar);
> return 0;
> + case 15:
> + insert_stsi_15_1_x(cpu, run->s390_stsi.sel2, run->s390_stsi.addr,
> + run->s390_stsi.ar);
> + return 0;
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.c b/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..0b789450da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/stsi-topology.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * QEMU S390x CPU Topology
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022,2023
> + * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> + *
> + */
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "cpu.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * fill_container:
> + * @p: The address of the container TLE to fill
> + * @level: The level of nesting for this container
> + * @id: The container receives a unique ID inside its own container
> + *
> + * Returns the next free TLE entry.
> + */
> +static char *fill_container(char *p, int level, int id)
> +{
> + SysIBTl_container *tle = (SysIBTl_container *)p;
> +
> + tle->nl = level;
> + tle->id = id;
> + return p + sizeof(*tle);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * fill_tle_cpu:
> + * @p: The address of the CPU TLE to fill
> + * @entry: a pointer to the S390TopologyEntry defining this
> + * CPU container.
> + *
> + * Returns the next free TLE entry.
> + */
> +static char *fill_tle_cpu(char *p, S390TopologyEntry *entry)
> +{
> + SysIBTl_cpu *tle = (SysIBTl_cpu *)p;
> + s390_topology_id topology_id = entry->id;
> +
> + tle->nl = 0;
> + if (topology_id.dedicated) {
> + tle->flags = SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED;
> + }
> + tle->flags |= topology_id.entitlement;
If it was not dedicated, the "|=" might operate with a random value here.
Better pre-initialize flags with 0, or change the order of the operations here:
tle->flags = topology_id.entitlement;
if (topology_id.dedicated) {
tle->flags |= SYSIB_TLE_DEDICATED;
}
> + tle->type = topology_id.type;
> + tle->origin = cpu_to_be16(topology_id.origin * 64);
> + tle->mask = cpu_to_be64(entry->mask);
> + return p + sizeof(*tle);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Macro to check that the size of data after increment
> + * will not get bigger than the size of the SysIB.
> + */
> +#define SYSIB_GUARD(data, x) do { \
> + data += x; \
> + if (data > sizeof(SysIB)) { \
> + return 0; \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +/**
> + * stsi_topology_fill_sysib:
> + * @p: A pointer to the position of the first TLE
> + * @level: The nested level wanted by the guest
> + *
> + * Fill the SYSIB with the topology information as described in
> + * the PoP, nesting containers as appropriate, with the maximum
> + * nesting limited by @level.
> + *
> + * Return value:
> + * On success: the size of the SysIB_15x after being filled with TLE.
> + * On error: 0 in the case we would overrun the end of the SysIB.
> + */
> +static int stsi_topology_fill_sysib(S390TopologyList *topology_list,
> + char *p, int level)
> +{
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry;
> + int last_drawer = -1;
> + int last_book = -1;
> + int last_socket = -1;
> + int drawer_id = 0;
> + int book_id = 0;
> + int socket_id = 0;
> + int n = sizeof(SysIB_151x);
> +
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(entry, topology_list, next) {
> + bool drawer_change = last_drawer != entry->id.drawer;
> + bool book_change = drawer_change || last_book != entry->id.book;
> + bool socket_change = book_change || last_socket != entry->id.socket;
> +
> + /* If we reach the sentinel get out */
> + if (entry->id.sentinel) {
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (level > 3 && drawer_change) {
> + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container));
> + p = fill_container(p, 3, drawer_id++);
> + book_id = 0;
> + }
> + if (level > 2 && book_change) {
> + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container));
> + p = fill_container(p, 2, book_id++);
> + socket_id = 0;
> + }
> + if (socket_change) {
> + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_container));
> + p = fill_container(p, 1, socket_id++);
> + }
> +
> + SYSIB_GUARD(n, sizeof(SysIBTl_cpu));
> + p = fill_tle_cpu(p, entry);
> + last_drawer = entry->id.drawer;
> + last_book = entry->id.book;
> + last_socket = entry->id.socket;
> + }
> +
> + return n;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * setup_stsi:
> + * sysib: pointer to a SysIB to be filled with SysIB_151x data
> + * level: Nested level specified by the guest
> + *
> + * Setup the SYSIB for STSI 15.1, the header as well as the description
> + * of the topology.
> + */
> +static int setup_stsi(S390TopologyList *topology_list, SysIB_151x *sysib,
> + int level)
> +{
> + sysib->mnest = level;
> + switch (level) {
> + case 4:
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG4] = current_machine->smp.drawers;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3] = current_machine->smp.books;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.sockets;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores;
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG3] = current_machine->smp.drawers *
> + current_machine->smp.books;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.sockets;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores;
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG2] = current_machine->smp.drawers *
> + current_machine->smp.books *
> + current_machine->smp.sockets;
> + sysib->mag[S390_TOPOLOGY_MAG1] = current_machine->smp.cores;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return stsi_topology_fill_sysib(topology_list, sysib->tle, level);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry:
> + * @entry: Topology entry to setup
> + * @cpu: the S390CPU to add
> + *
> + * Set the core bit inside the topology mask and
> + * increments the number of cores for the socket.
The second part of the sentence does not seem to be done here anymore?
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(S390TopologyEntry *entry,
> + S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + set_bit(63 - (cpu->env.core_id % 64), &entry->mask);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_from_cpu:
> + * @cpu: The S390CPU
> + *
> + * Initialize the topology id from the CPU environment.
> + */
> +static s390_topology_id s390_topology_from_cpu(S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + s390_topology_id topology_id = {0};
> +
> + topology_id.drawer = cpu->env.drawer_id;
> + topology_id.book = cpu->env.book_id;
> + topology_id.socket = cpu->env.socket_id;
> + topology_id.origin = cpu->env.core_id / 64;
> + topology_id.type = S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_IFL;
> + topology_id.dedicated = cpu->env.dedicated;
> +
> + if (s390_topology.polarization == S390_CPU_POLARIZATION_VERTICAL) {
> + topology_id.entitlement = cpu->env.entitlement;
> + }
> +
> + return topology_id;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_insert:
> + * @cpu: s390CPU insert.
"s390CPU insert" sounds like a weird description for @cpu
> + *
> + * Parse the topology list to find if the entry already
> + * exist and add the core in it.
> + * If it does not exist, allocate a new entry and insert
> + * it in the queue from lower id to greater id.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_insert(S390TopologyList *topology_list, S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> + s390_topology_id id = s390_topology_from_cpu(cpu);
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry = NULL;
> + S390TopologyEntry *tmp = NULL;
> +
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(tmp, topology_list, next) {
> + if (id.id == tmp->id.id) {
> + s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(tmp, cpu);
> + return;
> + } else if (id.id < tmp->id.id) {
> + entry = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390TopologyEntry));
> + entry->id.id = id.id;
> + s390_topology_add_cpu_to_entry(entry, cpu);
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(tmp, entry, next);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_fill_list_sorted:
> + *
> + * Loop over all CPU and insert it at the right place
> + * inside the TLE entry list.
> + * Fill the S390Topology list with entries according to the order
> + * specified by the PoP.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_fill_list_sorted(S390TopologyList *topology_list)
> +{
> + CPUState *cs;
> +
> + CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> + s390_topology_insert(topology_list, S390_CPU(cs));
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * s390_topology_empty_list:
> + *
> + * Clear all entries in the S390Topology list except the sentinel.
> + */
> +static void s390_topology_empty_list(S390TopologyList *topology_list)
> +{
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry = NULL;
> + S390TopologyEntry *tmp = NULL;
> +
> + QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(entry, topology_list, next, tmp) {
> + QTAILQ_REMOVE(topology_list, entry, next);
> + g_free(entry);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * insert_stsi_15_1_x:
> + * cpu: the CPU doing the call for which we set CC
> + * sel2: the selector 2, containing the nested level
> + * addr: Guest logical address of the guest SysIB
> + * ar: the access register number
> + *
> + * Create a list head for the Topology entries and initialize it.
s/Topology/topology/
> + * Insert the first entry as a sentinelle.
s/sentinelle/sentinel/
> + * Emulate STSI 15.1.x, that is, perform all necessary checks and
> + * fill the SYSIB.
> + * In case the topology description is too long to fit into the SYSIB,
> + * set CC=3 and abort without writing the SYSIB.
> + */
> +void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, uint64_t addr, uint8_t ar)
> +{
> + S390TopologyList topology_list;
> + S390TopologyEntry *entry;
> + SysIB sysib = {0};
> + int length;
> +
> + if (!s390_has_topology() || sel2 < 2 || sel2 > SCLP_READ_SCP_INFO_MNEST) {
> + setcc(cpu, 3);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + QTAILQ_INIT(&topology_list);
> + entry = g_malloc0(sizeof(S390TopologyEntry));
> + entry->id.sentinel = 0xff;
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&topology_list, entry, next);
> +
> + s390_topology_fill_list_sorted(&topology_list);
> +
> + length = setup_stsi(&topology_list, &sysib.sysib_151x, sel2);
> +
> + if (!length) {
> + setcc(cpu, 3);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + sysib.sysib_151x.length = cpu_to_be16(length);
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &sysib, length);
> + setcc(cpu, 0);
s390_cpu_virt_mem_write() could fail, I think in that case you should not
change the CC value here?
Also, what about protected virtualization? Do you have to use
s390_cpu_pv_mem_write() in case PV is enabled?
> +
> + s390_topology_empty_list(&topology_list);
> +}
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm/meson.build b/target/s390x/kvm/meson.build
> index 37253f75bf..bcf014ba87 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm/meson.build
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm/meson.build
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>
> s390x_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_KVM', if_true: files(
> - 'kvm.c'
> + 'kvm.c',
> + 'stsi-topology.c'
> ), if_false: files(
> 'stubs.c'
> ))
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-04 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-30 9:17 [PATCH v21 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 01/20] s390x/cpu topology: add s390 specifics to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 16:31 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-21 11:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-24 10:15 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-25 8:43 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 02/20] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 10:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 11:20 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-24 20:19 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-25 8:44 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 03/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: handle STSI(15) and build the SYSIB Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 11:40 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2023-07-04 12:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-12 20:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-25 15:41 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-26 8:11 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-27 17:31 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 04/20] s390x/sclp: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 05/20] s390x/cpu topology: resetting the Topology-Change-Report Pierre Morel
2023-07-25 13:43 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 06/20] s390x/cpu topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:40 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 07/20] target/s390x/cpu topology: activate CPU topology Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 08/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: set-cpu-topology qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 14:45 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 7:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-18 12:25 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 09/20] machine: adding s390 topology to query-cpu-fast Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:55 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 15:44 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 10/20] machine: adding s390 topology to info hotpluggable-cpus Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 12:59 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:02 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 11/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: CPU_POLARIZATION_CHANGE qapi event Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 13:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:05 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-18 7:59 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-18 12:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 12/20] qapi/s390x/cpu topology: query-cpu-polarization qmp command Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 7:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:12 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-26 11:54 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 13/20] docs/s390x/cpu topology: document s390x cpu topology Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 8:41 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 16:27 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 14/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology core Pierre Morel
2023-07-04 13:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 9:24 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-12 20:00 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 11:05 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 15/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology polarisation Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 8:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 11:35 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 16/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology entitlement tests Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-12 19:37 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-12 20:11 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-14 16:30 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-19 14:13 ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-07-19 15:34 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 17/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test dedicated CPU Pierre Morel
2023-07-19 14:09 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 18/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology test socket full Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 19/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology dedicated errors Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:28 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:21 ` Pierre Morel
2023-06-30 9:17 ` [PATCH v21 20/20] tests/avocado: s390x cpu topology bad move Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:32 ` Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 14:23 ` Pierre Morel
2023-07-05 10:02 ` [PATCH v21 00/20] s390x: CPU Topology Thomas Huth
2023-07-19 15:27 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aef8accb-3576-2b10-a946-191a6be3e3e0@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).