From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:14:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aff6768f-a659-4c25-8417-2f24007c5fc3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8aee65f-7cda-46a7-8c13-3d3645f130bf@linaro.org>
On 25/04/2024 17.04, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 4/24/24 22:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 24/04/2024 18.21, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 4/24/24 00:57, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> 13b1e9667737132440f4d500c31cb69320c6b15a:
>>>>
>>>> Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu into
>>>> staging (2024-04-23 17:35:57 -0700)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu.git tags/pull-request-2024-04-24
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 8f29bab03ea22694a127ee33edeb4ce99eeb124e:
>>>>
>>>> target/s390x: Remove KVM stubs in cpu_models.h (2024-04-24 09:45:02
>>>> +0200)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> * Update OpenBSD CI image to 7.5
>>>> * Update/remove Ubuntu 20.04 CI jobs
>>>> * Update CentOS 8 CI jobs to CentOS 9
>>>> * Some clean-ups and improvements to travis.yml
>>>> * Minor test fixes
>>>> * s390x header clean-ups
>>>> * Doc updates
>>>
>>> This introduces a failure in the migration-compat-x86_64 job:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/6707154868
>>
>> It wasn't failing for me:
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/6702058896
>>
>> And according to the diffstat of my pull request, it's only touching test
>> files, docs, and s390x stuff, so I somehow fail to see how it could
>> influence x86 migration at a first glance. It also looks like the job is
>> running on opensuse, and not on CentOS or Ubuntu, so it should likely not
>> be influenced by the changes in this PR.
>>
>> Could you please hit the re-run button of that job? If it then passes,
>> we're likely rather facing an intermitted failure that might have been
>> introduced earlier already...
>
> It did pass when re-run.
Ok, thanks! So it's likely and intermitted problem indeed...
I've now submitted a v2 of the pull request where I just dropped the other
problematic patch that tried to update the custom CentOS runner ... I hope
that PR should be fine now.
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 7:57 [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 01/17] MAINTAINERS: update email of Peter Lieven Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 02/17] tests/qtest : Use `g_assert_cmphex` instead of `g_assert_cmpuint` Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 03/17] docs: i386: pc: Update maximum CPU numbers for PC Q35 Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 04/17] tests/vm: update openbsd image to 7.5 Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 05/17] Revert ".travis.yml: Cache Avocado cache" Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 06/17] .travis.yml: Remove the unused UNRELIABLE environment variable Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 07/17] .travis.yml: Update the jobs to Ubuntu 22.04 Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 08/17] .travis.yml: Do some more testing with Clang Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 09/17] tests: Remove Ubuntu 20.04 container Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 10/17] tests/lcitool/libvirt-ci: Update to the latest master branch Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 11/17] tests/docker/dockerfiles: Run lcitool-refresh after the lcitool update Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 12/17] tests: Update our CI to use CentOS Stream 9 instead of 8 Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 16:19 ` Richard Henderson
2024-04-25 5:02 ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 13/17] ci: move external build environment setups to CentOS Stream 9 Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 14/17] hw/s390x: Include missing 'cpu.h' header Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 15/17] docs/devel: fix minor typo in submitting-a-patch.rst Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 16/17] tests/unit: Remove debug statements in test-nested-aio-poll.c Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 7:57 ` [PULL 17/17] target/s390x: Remove KVM stubs in cpu_models.h Thomas Huth
2024-04-24 16:21 ` [PULL 00/17] CI job updates, header cleanups and other misc patches Richard Henderson
2024-04-25 5:11 ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-25 7:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-04-25 12:56 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-04-25 15:04 ` Richard Henderson
2024-04-25 15:14 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aff6768f-a659-4c25-8417-2f24007c5fc3@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).