qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] hw/core/machine: Add an unit test for smp_parse
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:28:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aff7ec09-ec31-bf4f-b36c-67329f1fa02d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91def190-d563-e463-7915-525d67631194@redhat.com>


On 2021/10/28 22:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/26/21 05:46, Yanan Wang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is v3 which introduces an unit test for generic smp_parse.
>>
>> We have had enough discussions about what kind of SMP configurations
>> by the user should be considered valid and what should be invalid.
>> Since we have finished optimizing the SMP parsing code, then this
>> test normatively listed all the possible valid/invalid configurations
>> that the user can provide. This can be a testing tool when we
>> introduce new topology members and need to touch the parsing code.
>>
>> For your reference, some related discussion is here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/YOxf+sxzUSJdbY+j@redhat.com/
>>
>> Changelog:
>> v2->v3:
>> - add Andrew's R-b for PATCH #1
>> - drop an unused macro definition in PATCH #2
>> - v2: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20211013074119.23028-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - split smp_parse out into a separate .c file instead of a header (patch #1)
>> - dropped an unnecessary function and add Andrew's R-b (patch #2)
>> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20211010103954.20644-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/
>>
>> Yanan Wang (2):
>>    hw/core/machine: Split out the smp parsing code
>>    tests/unit: Add an unit test for smp parsing
> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>
Thank you for the testing/review and the help of v4 respin.

Thanks,
Yanan
.


      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-29  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26  3:46 [PATCH v3 0/2] hw/core/machine: Add an unit test for smp_parse Yanan Wang
2021-10-26  3:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] hw/core/machine: Split out the smp parsing code Yanan Wang
2021-10-26  3:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] tests/unit: Add an unit test for smp parsing Yanan Wang
2021-10-28 11:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] hw/core/machine: Add an unit test for smp_parse wangyanan (Y)
2021-10-28 14:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-29  6:28   ` wangyanan (Y) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aff7ec09-ec31-bf4f-b36c-67329f1fa02d@huawei.com \
    --to=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).