From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNNXH-00063E-8d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:38:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNNXE-00027l-Jz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:38:43 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:51285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNNXE-00027h-CU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:38:40 -0500 Received: by bkbzu5 with SMTP id zu5so4104845bkb.4 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:38:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pekka Enberg Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:38:29 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Enberg In-Reply-To: <4EB7B375.4090904@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4EB67486.1070105@redhat.com> <4EB67D17.7000701@redhat.com> <4EB680D9.2070706@redhat.com> <4EB6AE34.2000907@redhat.com> <4EB6BAED.2030400@redhat.com> <4EB6BEFA.6000303@codemonkey.ws> <20111106183132.GA4500@thunk.org> <4EB7B375.4090904@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Alexander Graf , Ted Ts'o , "kvm@vger.kernel.org list" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , qemu-devel Developers , Pekka Enberg , Blue Swirl , Avi Kivity , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Am=E9rico_Wang?= , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Makes it a lot less hackable for me unless you want to restrict the set > of potential developers to Linux kernel developers... We're not restricting potential developers to Linux kernel folks. We're making it easy for them because we believe that the KVM tool is a userspace component that requires the kind of low-level knowledge Linux kernel developers have. I think you're looking at the KVM tool with your QEMU glasses on without realizing that there's no point in comparing the two: we only support Linux on Linux and we avoid hardware emulation as much as possible. So what makes sense for QEMU, doesn't necessarily translate to the KVM tool project. Pekka