From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rjznm-0005c8-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:57:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rjznl-0004sJ-8d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:57:14 -0500 Received: from chello084112167138.7.11.vie.surfer.at ([84.112.167.138]:42505 helo=wiesinger.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rjznk-0004s6-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:57:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:56:20 +0100 (CET) From: Gerhard Wiesinger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] network: Added option to disable NIC option roms List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin O'Connor , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov , Gerd Hoffmann On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: >> Option ROM for network interface cards (NICs) can now explicitly disabled >> with romfile=disabled parameter. With hotplugable NICs (currently NE2000, >> PCNET) >> romfile=(empty) didn't work. This patch disables Option ROMs for iPXE for >> alls >> supported NICs (hotplugable and non hotplugable). >> >> Examples with 2 NICs with disabled Option ROM (separated on different lines >> for readability): >> -device rtl8139,mac=1a:46:0b:ca:bc:7c,vlan=0,romfile=disabled >> -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no,vlan=0 >> -device pcnet,mac=1a:46:0b:ca:bc:7e,vlan=1,romfile=disabled >> -net tap,ifname=tap1,script=no,downscript=no,vlan=1 > > Did you consider "no" or "none"? Those are already used by -net > script=no and -vga none. I'm afraid we don't have much consistency in > the command-line and adding more variants of basically the same > concept should be avoided when possible. Whether the option is spelled "disabled", "no", "none" or all of them above: I don't care about that, just the group of maintainers should decide (I would prefer all of them ...). The only thing: just help me with git and doing another commit and preparing V2 patch then ... # I did: git stash save mypatch git branch -b mybranch lastcommit # can be optimized with -b option ... git checkout mybranch git stash pop git merge --squash master git commit -a -F - <