From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5tK1-0007wi-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:29:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5tJz-0006vc-Ld for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:29:00 -0500 Received: from chello084112167138.7.11.vie.surfer.at ([84.112.167.138]:54585 helo=wiesinger.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5tJz-0006vV-B9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:28:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:28:05 +0100 (CET) From: Gerhard Wiesinger In-Reply-To: <4F5884F4.7010402@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4F586345.8010905@redhat.com> <4F5873D6.5010008@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4F5884F4.7010402@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] XP install cores with SCSI LSI 53C895A disks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Brian Jackson , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 03/08/12 09:54, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 08.03.2012 11:44, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>>> OK, but SAS (Serial attached SCSI) is technology in the area of storage >>>> interface technology where all big storage vendors see future (e.g. they >>>> give up: FC and SATA drives, SATA drives are replaced by MDL SATA drives >>>> (SATA 7200RPM drives with SAS interface)). >>> >>> The problem isn't scsi. The problem is the lsi adapter. Problem #1 is >>> the hardware design which makes it hard to emulate it correctly and #2 >>> that you need a non-redistributable rom file to boot from it. >> >> #2 isn't an issue actually, at least for Debian users -- > > Well, it is, to some degree. Because vanilla upstream doesn't support > booting from lsi it has alot less users and alot less regression testing > (like autotest runs of lsi-scsi installs), which sums up to more bugs > staying unnoticed like the one which triggered this thread. What's the holdup to integrate it into QEMU? Ciao, Gerhard -- http://www.wiesinger.com/